FTXR vs. QQQM
FTXR (First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXR is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXR returned 6.66%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXR charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.
Performance
FTXR vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXR achieves a 14.58% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.
FTXR
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 11.32%
- YTD
- 14.58%
- 6M
- 18.08%
- 1Y
- 43.09%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
FTXR vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 14.58% | 14.70% | 17.09% | 20.93% | -25.38% | 24.02% | 14.27% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXR and QQQM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between FTXR and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTXR vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXR
QQQM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
FTXR
QQQM
Consumer Cyclical
FTXR
QQQM
Energy
FTXR
QQQM
Basic Materials
FTXR
-
QQQM
Communication Services
FTXR
-
QQQM
Consumer Defensive
FTXR
-
QQQM
Financial Services
FTXR
-
QQQM
Healthcare
FTXR
-
QQQM
Real Estate
FTXR
-
QQQM
Technology
FTXR
-
QQQM
Utilities
FTXR
-
QQQM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXR vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank
FTXR
QQQM
FTXR vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.99 | 3.53 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.08 | 13.52 | -3.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.99 | 2.65 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.82 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.85 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
FTXR vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXR drawdown since its inception was -52.06%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXR and QQQM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.06% | -35.04% | -17.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -11.96% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.71% | -22.70% | -7.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.96% | -35.04% | +1.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -0.20% | -0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.06% | -8.25% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.29% | 3.11% | +1.18% |
Volatility
FTXR vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF (FTXR) has a higher volatility of 6.70% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.48%. This indicates that FTXR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXR | QQQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.70% | 4.48% | +2.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.48% | 12.05% | +4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.79% | 15.91% | +5.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.85% | 22.24% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 22.12% | +2.63% |
FTXR vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXR has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXR vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison
FTXR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXR First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF | 1.14% | 1.52% | 2.13% | 1.50% | 2.38% | 0.67% | 0.33% | 1.34% | 1.74% | 1.18% | 0.24% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXR and QQQM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXR has higher volatility (6.70%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXR dropped -52.06% vs QQQM's -35.04%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 6.66% for FTXR. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXR.
FTXR has the higher dividend yield at 1.14%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
FTXR is categorized as Industrials Equities, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. FTXR tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Transportation Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXR and 0.15% for QQQM.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXR and QQQM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer