FTXG vs. LVHD
FTXG (First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF) and LVHD (Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while LVHD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXG returned -1.45%/yr vs 6.06%/yr for LVHD. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
FTXG vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXG achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 6.72% return.
FTXG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 5.86%
- 6M
- 4.05%
- 1Y
- 0.33%
- 3Y*
- -3.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.45%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 6.51%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 9.33%
- 5Y*
- 6.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
FTXG vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 5.86% | -6.52% | -2.52% | -6.48% | 6.15% | 13.48% | 6.63% | 23.97% | -12.09% | 5.64% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 6.72% | 7.50% | 10.18% | -0.95% | -1.82% | 26.90% | -1.28% | 22.91% | -5.58% | 14.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXG and LVHD is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.60 |
The correlation between FTXG and LVHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (all time) to 0.75 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTXG vs. LVHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXG
LVHD
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXG
LVHD
Basic Materials
FTXG
LVHD
-
Industrials
FTXG
LVHD
Communication Services
FTXG
-
LVHD
Consumer Cyclical
FTXG
-
LVHD
Energy
FTXG
-
LVHD
Financial Services
FTXG
-
LVHD
Healthcare
FTXG
-
LVHD
Real Estate
FTXG
-
LVHD
Technology
FTXG
-
LVHD
Utilities
FTXG
-
LVHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXG vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
FTXG
LVHD
FTXG vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTXG | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.17 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 1.56 | -1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.06 | 3.98 | -3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTXG | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 | 1.01 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 | 0.47 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | 0.56 | -0.38 |
Drawdowns
FTXG vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXG drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXG and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXG | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.52% | -37.32% | +5.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | -6.17% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | -14.29% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.68% | -16.75% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.76% | -4.84% | -9.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -4.05% | -3.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.40% | 2.42% | +2.98% |
Volatility
FTXG vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD) at 2.86%. This indicates that FTXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXG | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.29% | 2.86% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 6.64% | +2.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 9.52% | +4.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.46% | 12.87% | +1.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 15.50% | +1.13% |
FTXG vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXG vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
FTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than LVHD's 3.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 2.75% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 4.27% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 1.35% | 1.25% | 1.37% | 1.56% | 0.30% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 3.40% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXG and LVHD have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTXG has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to LVHD (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXG dropped -31.52% vs LVHD's -37.32%.
On 5-year performance, LVHD leads with 6.06% vs -1.45% for FTXG. On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, LVHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHD has performed better with a 6.06% return vs -1.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXG.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.40%, compared with 2.75% for FTXG.
FTXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. FTXG tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while LVHD tracks QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXG and 0.27% for LVHD.
LVHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXG and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer