FTXG vs. SOXX
FTXG (First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FTXG is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXG returned -0.17%/yr vs 33.69%/yr for SOXX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FTXG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
FTXG vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXG achieves a 6.56% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.58% return.
FTXG
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 6.56%
- 6M
- 6.55%
- 1Y
- 1.50%
- 3Y*
- -2.50%
- 5Y*
- -0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SOXX
- 1D
- -7.88%
- 1M
- 12.35%
- YTD
- 100.58%
- 6M
- 98.07%
- 1Y
- 167.63%
- 3Y*
- 56.18%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 36.08%
FTXG vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 6.56% | -6.52% | -2.52% | -6.48% | 6.15% | 13.48% | 6.63% | 23.97% | -12.09% | 5.64% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 100.58% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXG and SOXX is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2016 | 0.15 |
The correlation between FTXG and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTXG vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXG
SOXX
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXG
SOXX
-
Basic Materials
FTXG
SOXX
-
Industrials
FTXG
SOXX
-
Communication Services
FTXG
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXG
-
SOXX
-
Energy
FTXG
-
SOXX
-
Financial Services
FTXG
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
FTXG
-
SOXX
-
Real Estate
FTXG
-
SOXX
-
Technology
FTXG
-
SOXX
Utilities
FTXG
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXG vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
FTXG
SOXX
FTXG vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXG | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.60 | -0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 10.70 | -10.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 38.46 | -38.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXG vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXG drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum SOXX drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXG and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXG | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.52% | -70.21% | +38.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | -15.77% | +5.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | -41.36% | +23.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.68% | -45.75% | +24.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.19% | -7.88% | -6.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -19.94% | +12.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 4.38% | +1.20% |
Volatility
FTXG vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) is 4.60%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that FTXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXG | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 22.75% | -18.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 33.44% | -23.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.00% | 39.42% | -25.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.50% | 37.21% | -22.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 34.00% | -17.37% |
FTXG vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXG vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
FTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than SOXX's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 4.27% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 1.35% | 1.25% | 1.37% | 1.56% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.24% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXG and SOXX have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to FTXG (4.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXG dropped -31.52% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 5-year performance, SOXX leads with 33.69% vs -0.17% for FTXG. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, FTXG has been the lower-risk option at 4.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 33.69% return vs -0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXG.
FTXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 0.24% for SOXX.
FTXG is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SOXX is Semiconductors. FTXG tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXG and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXG and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer