FTXG vs. VDC
FTXG (First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF) and VDC (Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - FTXG tracks the Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index while VDC tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FTXG returned -0.40%/yr vs 6.96%/yr for VDC. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FTXG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VDC.
Performance
FTXG vs. VDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTXG achieves a 4.86% return, which is significantly lower than VDC's 6.86% return.
FTXG
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- YTD
- 4.86%
- 6M
- 3.69%
- 1Y
- 0.50%
- 3Y*
- -3.02%
- 5Y*
- -0.40%
- 10Y*
- —
VDC
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -2.26%
- YTD
- 6.86%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 7.47%
- 5Y*
- 6.96%
- 10Y*
- 7.74%
FTXG vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 4.86% | -6.52% | -2.52% | -6.48% | 6.15% | 13.48% | 6.63% | 23.97% | -12.09% | 5.64% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 6.86% | 2.17% | 13.30% | 2.38% | -1.79% | 17.64% | 10.86% | 26.11% | -7.79% | 11.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTXG and VDC is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2016 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FTXG and VDC shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FTXG vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FTXG
VDC
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
FTXG
VDC
Basic Materials
FTXG
VDC
Industrials
FTXG
VDC
Communication Services
FTXG
-
VDC
-
Consumer Cyclical
FTXG
-
VDC
Energy
FTXG
-
VDC
-
Financial Services
FTXG
-
VDC
-
Healthcare
FTXG
-
VDC
Real Estate
FTXG
-
VDC
-
Technology
FTXG
-
VDC
-
Utilities
FTXG
-
VDC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTXG vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank
FTXG
VDC
FTXG vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTXG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.08 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.05 | 0.55 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 1.09 | -1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTXG vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTXG drawdown since its inception was -31.52%, smaller than the maximum VDC drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTXG and VDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTXG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.52% | -34.24% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.14% | -9.28% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.10% | -11.78% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.68% | -16.55% | -5.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.57% | -7.56% | -8.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -3.73% | -3.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.57% | 4.65% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FTXG vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF (FTXG) is 4.27%, while Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) has a volatility of 4.82%. This indicates that FTXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTXG | VDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 4.82% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.07% | 10.20% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.94% | 12.69% | +1.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 13.18% | +1.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.62% | 14.68% | +1.94% |
FTXG vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FTXG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FTXG vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison
FTXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than VDC's 2.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTXG First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF | 2.78% | 2.93% | 2.75% | 4.27% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 1.35% | 1.25% | 1.37% | 1.56% | 0.30% | 0.00% |
VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF | 2.15% | 2.26% | 2.33% | 2.65% | 2.37% | 2.14% | 2.50% | 2.44% | 2.78% | 2.52% | 2.39% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FTXG and VDC have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDC has higher volatility (4.82%) compared to FTXG (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTXG dropped -31.52% vs VDC's -34.24%.
On 5-year performance, VDC leads with 6.96% vs -0.40% for FTXG. On fees, VDC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, FTXG has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VDC has performed better with a 6.96% return vs -0.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VDC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTXG.
FTXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 2.15% for VDC.
FTXG tracks Nasdaq U.S. Smart Food & Beverage Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTXG and 0.09% for VDC.
VDC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.40 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTXG and VDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer