FTIF vs. FDL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FTIF (First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF) and FDL (First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FTIF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FDL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FTIF returned 11.08%/yr vs 19.02%/yr for FDL. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FTIF charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for FDL.

Performance

FTIF vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTIF achieves a 23.66% return, which is significantly higher than FDL's 18.62% return.

FTIF

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 4.18%
• 6M: 14.24%
• YTD: 23.66%
• 1Y: 33.50%
• 3Y*: 11.08%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.81%

FDL

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 3.67%
• 6M: 9.83%
• YTD: 18.62%
• 1Y: 28.15%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 14.10%
• 10Y*: 11.08%
• ALL TIME*: 8.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	$51.38M	$49.50M	$43.21M
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	$97.77K	$75.15K	$62.02K

FTIF vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	23.66%	7.79%	0.50%	12.31%
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	18.62%	14.79%	17.98%	9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FTIF and FDL is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023	0.68

The correlation between FTIF and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FTIF vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FTIF	FDL
Energy	39.0%	11.1%
Basic Materials	20.6%	0.4%
Industrials	18.2%	3.6%
Real Estate	13.8%	-
Technology	4.4%	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	4.4%
Communication Services	-	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	24.3%
Financial Services	-	13.7%
Healthcare	-	11.7%
Utilities	-	15.4%

Return for Risk

FTIF vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FTIF

FTIF Risk / Return Rank: 89
FTIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
FTIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FTIF Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FTIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FTIF Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FDL

FDL Risk / Return Rank: 92
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FTIF vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FTIF	FDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.27	2.38	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.58	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.31	6.62	-1.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.40	15.62	-0.21

FTIF vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTIF Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTIF and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FTIF vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTIF drawdown since its inception was -27.83%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTIF and FDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTIF	FDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.83%	-65.93%	+38.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.34%	-4.27%	-2.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.83%	-12.24%	-15.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.40%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.20%	-1.58%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.90%	-9.59%	+3.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.18%	1.81%	+0.37%

Volatility

FTIF vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF (FTIF) is 2.78%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that FTIF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTIF	FDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.78%	4.65%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.50%	8.75%	+1.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.85%	11.89%	+2.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.72%	14.44%	+4.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	17.16%	+1.56%

FTIF vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FTIF has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

FTIF vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FTIF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than FDL's 3.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDL First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund	3.58%	4.04%	4.96%	4.58%	3.58%	4.59%	4.48%	3.75%	3.97%	3.18%	2.93%	3.65%
FTIF First Trust Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity ETF	1.08%	1.45%	2.88%	1.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FTIF and FDL in my portfolio?

FTIF and FDL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FTIF or FDL?

FDL has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to FTIF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTIF dropped -27.83% vs FDL's -65.93%.

Which ETF is better, FTIF or FDL?

On 3-year performance, FDL leads with 19.02% vs 11.08% for FTIF. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FTIF has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FTIF or FDL?

Over the 3-year period, FDL has performed better with a 19.02% return vs 11.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FTIF or FDL?

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FTIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FTIF or FDL?

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 1.08% for FTIF.

What is the main difference between FTIF and FDL?

FTIF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FTIF tracks Bloomberg Inflation Sensitive Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FTIF and 0.43% for FDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.