FSTA vs. FCPGX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) and FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) are both funds - FSTA is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index, while FCPGX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FSTA returned 8.01%/yr vs 14.97%/yr for FCPGX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSTA charges 0.08%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for FCPGX.

Performance

FSTA vs. FCPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FSTA achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than FCPGX's 18.99% return. Over the past 10 years, FSTA has underperformed FCPGX with an annualized return of 8.01%, while FCPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.97% annualized return.

FSTA

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 0.50%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 8.66%
• 1Y: 8.41%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: 7.07%
• 10Y*: 8.01%

FCPGX

• 1D: 4.26%
• 1M: 3.64%
• YTD: 18.99%
• 6M: 16.17%
• 1Y: 39.09%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: 7.60%
• 10Y*: 14.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FSTA vs. FCPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	10.62%	1.82%	13.31%	2.29%	-1.72%	17.44%	10.96%	26.84%	-8.49%	12.71%
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	18.99%	11.20%	20.56%	19.02%	-25.34%	10.50%	36.41%	36.31%	-4.57%	28.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FSTA and FCPGX is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.21
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013	0.41

The correlation between FSTA and FCPGX shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FSTA vs. FCPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FSTA

FSTA Risk / Return Rank: 19
FSTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FSTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
FSTA Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FSTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FSTA Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FCPGX

FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 59
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FSTA vs. FCPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FSTA	FCPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.66	-1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.91	2.29	-1.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.28	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.78	2.80	-2.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.56	11.15	-9.59

FSTA vs. FCPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FSTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the FCPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FSTA and FCPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FSTA vs. FCPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FSTA drawdown since its inception was -25.13%, smaller than the maximum FCPGX drawdown of -59.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSTA and FCPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FSTA	FCPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.13%	-59.11%	+33.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.29%	-13.12%	+3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.76%	-28.69%	+16.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.58%	-39.04%	+22.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.13%	-39.04%	+13.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.38%	-0.19%	-4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.56%	-10.69%	+7.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.62%	3.29%	+1.33%

Volatility

FSTA vs. FCPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) is 4.62%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) has a volatility of 8.73%. This indicates that FSTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FSTA	FCPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	8.73%	-4.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.03%	17.37%	-7.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.58%	22.11%	-9.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.15%	23.65%	-10.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.57%	22.92%	-8.35%

FSTA vs. FCPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FSTA has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPGX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FSTA vs. FCPGX - Dividend Comparison

FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than FCPGX's 5.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	5.37%	6.38%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	8.19%	5.31%	14.35%	6.88%	1.53%	4.32%
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF	2.15%	2.34%	2.25%	2.66%	2.26%	2.15%	2.47%	2.46%	3.01%	2.42%	2.53%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FSTA and FCPGX in my portfolio?

FSTA and FCPGX have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FSTA or FCPGX?

FCPGX has higher volatility (8.73%) compared to FSTA (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FSTA dropped -25.13% vs FCPGX's -59.11%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.