FSML vs. LVHD
FSML (Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF) and LVHD (Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSML is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while LVHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index. FSML is actively managed, while LVHD is passively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSML charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
FSML vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSML achieves a 22.46% return, which is significantly higher than LVHD's 14.62% return.
FSML
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.08%
- 6M
- 13.95%
- YTD
- 22.46%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- 3.49%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- YTD
- 14.62%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.26%
FSML vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 22.46% | -3.75% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 14.62% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSML and LVHD is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSML vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
FSML
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LVHD
FSML vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) and Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSML | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.71 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSML vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSML drawdown since its inception was -10.83%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSML and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSML | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -37.32% | +26.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | 0.00% | -2.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.40% | -4.02% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.49% | — |
Volatility
FSML vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSML | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.10% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.35% | 10.44% | +9.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 13.02% | +7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 15.56% | +4.79% |
FSML vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSML has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSML vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
FSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than LVHD's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 0.39% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHD Franklin U.S. Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 3.17% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSML and LVHD have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FSML.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 0.39% for FSML.
FSML is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while LVHD is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSML and 0.27% for LVHD.
Find the right allocation for FSML and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer