FSML vs. EZBC
FSML (Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FSML is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while EZBC is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. FSML is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FSML charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
FSML vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSML achieves a 23.14% return, which is significantly higher than EZBC's -32.39% return.
FSML
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 23.14%
- 6M
- 20.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -22.00%
- YTD
- -32.39%
- 6M
- -32.22%
- 1Y
- -45.24%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FSML vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 23.14% | -3.75% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -32.39% | -5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSML and EZBC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSML vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
FSML
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZBC
FSML vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSML | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSML vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSML drawdown since its inception was -10.83%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -52.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSML and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSML | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -52.94% | +42.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.94% | +52.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -17.01% | +14.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.92% | — |
Volatility
FSML vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSML | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.57% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 44.32% | -23.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 50.14% | -29.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 50.14% | -29.51% |
FSML vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSML has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSML vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
FSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 0.15% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSML and EZBC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FSML.
FSML has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.
FSML is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while EZBC is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSML and 0.19% for EZBC.
Find the right allocation for FSML and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer