FSML vs. OUSM
FSML (Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF) and OUSM (OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. FSML is actively managed, while OUSM is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FSML charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for OUSM.
Performance
FSML vs. OUSM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSML achieves a 23.14% return, which is significantly higher than OUSM's 9.92% return.
FSML
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 23.14%
- 6M
- 20.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OUSM
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 7.99%
- 1Y
- 12.49%
- 3Y*
- 11.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- —
FSML vs. OUSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 23.14% | -3.75% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 9.92% | -0.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FSML and OUSM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSML vs. OUSM — Risk / Return Rank
FSML
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
OUSM
FSML vs. OUSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF (FSML) and OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FSML | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.17 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.98 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FSML vs. OUSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSML drawdown since its inception was -10.83%, smaller than the maximum OUSM drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSML and OUSM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSML | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -39.84% | +29.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -5.19% | +2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.15% | — |
Volatility
FSML vs. OUSM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FSML | OUSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.63% | 13.08% | +7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 16.27% | +4.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 18.90% | +1.73% |
FSML vs. OUSM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FSML has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSM's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
FSML vs. OUSM - Dividend Comparison
FSML's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than OUSM's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSML Franklin Small Cap Enhanced ETF | 0.15% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OUSM OShares U.S. Small-Cap Quality Dividend ETF | 2.00% | 2.09% | 1.62% | 1.64% | 1.98% | 1.55% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.63% | 2.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FSML and OUSM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FSML is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FSML is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSM.
OUSM has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.15% for FSML.
They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for FSML and 0.48% for OUSM.
Find the right allocation for FSML and OUSM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer