FSAGX vs. FM.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO).
FSAGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 15, 1985.
Performance
FSAGX vs. FM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FSAGX vs. FM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 1.81% | 143.05% | 14.97% | -0.37% | -13.46% | -10.44% | 26.83% | 35.50% | -13.00% | 8.63% |
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | -10.78% | 108.11% | 57.29% | -60.53% | -12.25% | 33.50% | 77.16% | 25.37% | -42.14% | 41.11% |
Different Trading Currencies
FSAGX is traded in USD, while FM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the FM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FSAGX achieves a 1.81% return, which is significantly higher than FM.TO's -16.76% return. Over the past 10 years, FSAGX has underperformed FM.TO with an annualized return of 14.04%, while FM.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.80% annualized return.
FSAGX
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -25.44%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 14.65%
- 1Y
- 84.71%
- 3Y*
- 36.44%
- 5Y*
- 20.17%
- 10Y*
- 14.04%
FM.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -25.43%
- YTD
- -16.76%
- 6M
- -1.31%
- 1Y
- 65.91%
- 3Y*
- -0.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 15.80%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FSAGX vs. FM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FSAGX
FM.TO
FSAGX vs. FM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FSAGX | FM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.02 | 1.36 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 1.90 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 1.97 | +0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.66 | 6.16 | +4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FSAGX | FM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | 1.36 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.04 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.25 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.14 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FSAGX and FM.TO is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FSAGX vs. FM.TO - Dividend Comparison
FSAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while FM.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSAGX Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio | 2.13% | 2.17% | 3.62% | 0.99% | 0.36% | 1.60% | 4.40% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 3.57% | 0.00% |
FM.TO First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.94% | 0.58% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 1.58% |
Drawdowns
FSAGX vs. FM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FSAGX drawdown since its inception was -77.21%, smaller than the maximum FM.TO drawdown of -93.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FSAGX and FM.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FSAGX | FM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.21% | -90.98% | +13.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.85% | -30.35% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.94% | -78.27% | +32.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.57% | -78.27% | +27.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.44% | -25.11% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.41% | -36.83% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.95% | 9.78% | -1.83% |
Volatility
FSAGX vs. FM.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Gold Portfolio (FSAGX) is 15.39%, while First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a volatility of 18.52%. This indicates that FSAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FSAGX | FM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.39% | 18.52% | -3.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.05% | 34.36% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.73% | 48.95% | -6.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.76% | 60.17% | -27.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.05% | 64.07% | -31.02% |