PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRO vs. AMBA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FRO vs. AMBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 88.15% return, which is significantly higher than AMBA's 9.12% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has outperformed AMBA with an annualized return of 25.40%, while AMBA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.49% annualized return.


FRO

1D
4.29%
1M
7.17%
6M
64.34%
YTD
88.15%
1Y
120.41%
3Y*
47.42%
5Y*
45.52%
10Y*
25.40%

AMBA

1D
-1.38%
1M
17.48%
6M
11.62%
YTD
9.12%
1Y
15.58%
3Y*
-1.42%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
3.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRO vs. AMBA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
88.15%61.17%-22.48%96.23%73.67%13.67%-41.47%134.59%20.48%-32.17%
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
9.12%-2.61%18.68%-25.47%-59.47%120.96%51.62%73.13%-40.46%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between FRO and AMBA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2012

0.20

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FRO:

$8.49B

AMBA:

$3.39B

EPS

FRO:

$4.06

AMBA:

-$1.62

PS Ratio

FRO:

3.77

AMBA:

8.19

PB Ratio

FRO:

2.99

AMBA:

5.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRO:

$2.25B

AMBA:

$405.19M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRO:

$933.72M

AMBA:

$238.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

FRO:

$1.21B

AMBA:

-$69.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRO vs. AMBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRO
FRO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AMBA
AMBA Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBA Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBA Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRO vs. AMBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FROAMBADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.11

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.01

0.30

+5.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.05

0.59

+15.46

FRO vs. AMBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRO Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the AMBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRO and AMBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRO vs. AMBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, which is greater than AMBA's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and AMBA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FROAMBADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.36%

-81.65%

-16.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.41%

-49.06%

+27.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.04%

-52.74%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.04%

-81.65%

+29.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

-81.65%

+29.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-70.70%

-64.35%

-6.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.85%

-48.51%

-19.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.00%

24.62%

-16.62%

Volatility

FRO vs. AMBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is 18.96%, while Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a volatility of 35.14%. This indicates that FRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FROAMBADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.96%

35.14%

-16.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.34%

57.00%

-23.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.27%

72.60%

-29.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.84%

65.11%

-15.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.16%

57.86%

-6.70%

Dividends

FRO vs. AMBA - Dividend Comparison

FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.21%, while AMBA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBA
Ambarella, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
8.21%4.26%13.74%14.31%1.24%0.00%25.72%0.78%0.00%6.54%19.83%1.67%

Financials

FRO vs. AMBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontline Ltd. and Ambarella, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
714.24M
100.36M
(FRO) Total Revenue
(AMBA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FRO vs. AMBA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Frontline Ltd. and Ambarella, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
55.4%
58.4%
Portfolio components
FRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a gross profit of 395.96M and revenue of 714.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 58.59M and revenue of 100.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

FRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported an operating income of 370.04M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.8%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -19.42M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in an operating margin of -19.4%.

FRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a net income of 559.12M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in a net margin of 78.3%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -18.09M and revenue of 100.36M, resulting in a net margin of -18.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRO and AMBA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBA has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to FRO (18.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRO dropped -98.36% vs AMBA's -81.65%.

FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRO and AMBA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer