PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRO vs. KGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FRO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 105.17% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's -6.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has outperformed KGC with an annualized return of 26.31%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively lower 19.12% annualized return.


FRO

1D
1.59%
1M
16.89%
YTD
105.17%
6M
104.98%
1Y
141.62%
3Y*
56.36%
5Y*
48.00%
10Y*
26.31%

KGC

1D
-1.39%
1M
-7.03%
YTD
-6.36%
6M
-10.16%
1Y
70.84%
3Y*
80.92%
5Y*
35.25%
10Y*
19.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRO vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
105.17%61.17%-22.48%96.23%73.67%13.67%-41.47%134.59%20.48%-32.17%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
-6.36%206.11%55.63%51.83%-27.59%-19.00%56.04%46.30%-25.00%38.91%

Correlation

The correlation between FRO and KGC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2001

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FRO:

$9.26B

KGC:

$31.67B

EPS

FRO:

$4.06

KGC:

$2.35

PE Ratio

FRO:

10.23

KGC:

11.18

PS Ratio

FRO:

4.11

KGC:

4.03

PB Ratio

FRO:

3.26

KGC:

3.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

FRO:

$2.25B

KGC:

$7.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FRO:

$933.72M

KGC:

$4.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

FRO:

$1.21B

KGC:

$5.02B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRO vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRO
FRO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
FRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

KGC
KGC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
KGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
KGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
KGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
KGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FROKGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.25

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.65

1.89

+4.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.91

5.35

+13.56

FRO vs. KGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRO Sharpe Ratio is 3.38, which is higher than the KGC Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRO and KGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, roughly equal to the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and KGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FROKGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.36%

-96.00%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.41%

-37.69%

+16.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.04%

-37.69%

-14.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.04%

-55.22%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

-67.75%

+15.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-68.05%

-30.74%

-37.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.84%

-57.58%

-10.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.60%

13.28%

-5.68%

Volatility

FRO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is 13.58%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a volatility of 17.42%. This indicates that FRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FROKGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.58%

17.42%

-3.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.28%

41.02%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.18%

52.01%

-9.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.54%

44.13%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.13%

47.06%

+4.07%

Dividends

FRO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison

FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%, more than KGC's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRO
Frontline Ltd.
7.53%4.26%13.74%14.31%1.24%0.00%25.72%0.78%0.00%6.54%19.83%1.67%
KGC
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.55%0.44%1.29%1.98%2.93%2.69%0.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FRO vs. KGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontline Ltd. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
714.24M
2.37B
(FRO) Total Revenue
(KGC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FRO vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Frontline Ltd. and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
55.4%
57.8%
Portfolio components
FRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a gross profit of 395.96M and revenue of 714.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.

KGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.37B and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.8%.

FRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported an operating income of 370.04M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.8%.

KGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.31B and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

FRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a net income of 559.12M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in a net margin of 78.3%.

KGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 831.32M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FRO and KGC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KGC has higher volatility (17.42%) compared to FRO (13.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRO dropped -98.36% vs KGC's -96.00%.

FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.38 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRO and KGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer