FRO vs. KGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FRO or KGC.
Correlation
The correlation between FRO and KGC is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
FRO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FRO:
-0.69
KGC:
1.38
FRO:
-0.85
KGC:
1.92
FRO:
0.91
KGC:
1.24
FRO:
-0.30
KGC:
0.68
FRO:
-1.51
KGC:
6.83
FRO:
18.36%
KGC:
8.18%
FRO:
40.23%
KGC:
40.43%
FRO:
-98.40%
KGC:
-96.04%
FRO:
-91.14%
KGC:
-65.39%
Fundamentals
FRO:
$3.08B
KGC:
$11.77B
FRO:
$2.46
KGC:
$0.60
FRO:
5.62
KGC:
15.95
FRO:
0.00
KGC:
-3.90
FRO:
$2.04B
KGC:
$5.18B
FRO:
$744.04M
KGC:
$1.75B
FRO:
$1.07B
KGC:
$2.77B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a -26.90% return, which is significantly lower than KGC's 54.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 7.85%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.68% annualized return.
FRO
-26.90%
-32.41%
-45.21%
-29.74%
12.18%
7.85%
KGC
54.83%
-7.22%
21.78%
53.31%
19.02%
14.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FRO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FRO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.57%, more than KGC's 0.97% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 14.57% | 14.31% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 25.72% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 6.54% | 14.77% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.97% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.07% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.83% |
Drawdowns
FRO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, roughly equal to the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and KGC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FRO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
Frontline Ltd. (FRO) has a higher volatility of 15.27% compared to Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) at 12.46%. This indicates that FRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
FRO vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontline Ltd. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities