FRO vs. KGC
Compare and contrast key facts about Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC).
Performance
FRO vs. KGC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FRO vs. KGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 64.69% | 61.17% | -22.48% | 96.23% | 73.67% | 13.67% | -41.47% | 134.59% | 20.48% | -32.17% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 13.85% | 206.11% | 55.63% | 51.83% | -27.59% | -19.00% | 56.04% | 46.30% | -25.00% | 38.91% |
Fundamentals
FRO:
$7.75B
KGC:
$38.70B
FRO:
$1.70
KGC:
$1.97
FRO:
20.45
KGC:
16.29
FRO:
3.95
KGC:
5.53
FRO:
3.09
KGC:
4.52
FRO:
$1.97B
KGC:
$7.06B
FRO:
$644.05M
KGC:
$3.48B
FRO:
$943.61M
KGC:
$4.26B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 64.69% return, which is significantly higher than KGC's 13.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has underperformed KGC with an annualized return of 23.45%, while KGC has yielded a comparatively higher 26.22% annualized return.
FRO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- YTD
- 64.69%
- 6M
- 58.44%
- 1Y
- 147.39%
- 3Y*
- 40.65%
- 5Y*
- 46.49%
- 10Y*
- 23.45%
KGC
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- 13.85%
- 6M
- 26.14%
- 1Y
- 155.70%
- 3Y*
- 92.13%
- 5Y*
- 38.11%
- 10Y*
- 26.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRO vs. KGC — Risk / Return Rank
FRO
KGC
FRO vs. KGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.12 | 3.11 | +0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.48 | 3.04 | +0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.45 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.02 | 5.15 | +1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.22 | 18.12 | +2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.12 | 3.11 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.88 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.55 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.09 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FRO and KGC is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FRO vs. KGC - Dividend Comparison
FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.05%, more than KGC's 0.42% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 5.05% | 4.26% | 13.74% | 14.31% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 25.72% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 6.54% | 19.83% | 1.67% |
KGC Kinross Gold Corporation | 0.42% | 0.44% | 1.29% | 1.98% | 2.93% | 2.69% | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FRO vs. KGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, roughly equal to the maximum KGC drawdown of -96.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and KGC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.36% | -96.00% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.41% | -30.20% | +8.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.04% | -61.44% | +9.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -67.75% | +10.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.35% | -15.79% | -58.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.81% | -57.84% | -9.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.44% | 8.58% | -1.14% |
Volatility
FRO vs. KGC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) is 15.37%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) has a volatility of 16.80%. This indicates that FRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FRO | KGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.37% | 16.80% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.24% | 41.14% | -10.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.58% | 50.45% | -2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.38% | 43.55% | +5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.46% | 47.67% | +3.79% |
Financials
FRO vs. KGC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontline Ltd. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRO vs. KGC - Profitability Comparison
FRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a gross profit of 288.91M and revenue of 624.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.3%.
KGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 2.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.
FRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported an operating income of 277.74M and revenue of 624.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 44.5%.
KGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 985.01M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.
FRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a net income of 227.93M and revenue of 624.51M, resulting in a net margin of 36.5%.
KGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 920.43M and revenue of 2.05B, resulting in a net margin of 44.8%.