FRO vs. DHT
FRO (Frontline Ltd.) and DHT (DHT Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas Midstream industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 10 years, FRO returned 22.50%/yr vs 19.90%/yr for DHT. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FRO vs. DHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a 62.94% return, which is significantly higher than DHT's 42.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has outperformed DHT with an annualized return of 22.50%, while DHT has yielded a comparatively lower 19.90% annualized return.
FRO
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -7.02%
- YTD
- 62.94%
- 6M
- 51.91%
- 1Y
- 106.10%
- 3Y*
- 45.60%
- 5Y*
- 42.39%
- 10Y*
- 22.50%
DHT
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -8.64%
- YTD
- 42.60%
- 6M
- 34.76%
- 1Y
- 57.65%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 30.54%
- 10Y*
- 19.90%
FRO vs. DHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 62.94% | 61.17% | -22.48% | 96.23% | 73.67% | 13.67% | -41.47% | 134.59% | 20.48% | -32.17% |
DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. | 42.60% | 40.04% | 3.58% | 24.07% | 73.87% | 1.41% | -20.52% | 118.96% | 11.32% | -9.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRO and DHT is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2005 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, FRO and DHT have become more correlated (0.85) than their long-term average of 0.57, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
FRO:
$7.67B
DHT:
$2.64B
FRO:
$4.06
DHT:
$2.06
FRO:
8.48
DHT:
7.96
FRO:
3.41
DHT:
4.66
FRO:
2.70
DHT:
2.14
FRO:
$2.25B
DHT:
$566.07M
FRO:
$933.72M
DHT:
$268.69M
FRO:
$1.21B
DHT:
$450.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRO vs. DHT — Risk / Return Rank
FRO
DHT
FRO vs. DHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FRO | DHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 3.81 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.64 | 8.15 | +5.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRO | DHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 1.72 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.80 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.48 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | -0.05 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
FRO vs. DHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.36%, roughly equal to the maximum DHT drawdown of -97.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and DHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRO | DHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.36% | -97.12% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.41% | -15.22% | -6.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -52.04% | -24.96% | -27.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.04% | -34.44% | -17.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.14% | -39.56% | -17.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -74.62% | -67.08% | -7.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.84% | -76.39% | +8.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.80% | 7.09% | +0.71% |
Volatility
FRO vs. DHT - Volatility Comparison
Frontline Ltd. (FRO) has a higher volatility of 10.53% compared to DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) at 9.39%. This indicates that FRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRO | DHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.53% | 9.39% | +1.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.64% | 26.86% | +3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.97% | 33.65% | +8.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.34% | 38.26% | +11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.16% | 41.58% | +9.58% |
Dividends
FRO vs. DHT - Dividend Comparison
FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.11%, less than DHT's 8.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHT DHT Holdings, Inc. | 8.97% | 6.06% | 10.76% | 11.72% | 1.35% | 2.50% | 25.81% | 2.42% | 2.04% | 5.57% | 17.15% | 6.55% |
FRO Frontline Ltd. | 5.11% | 4.26% | 13.74% | 14.31% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 25.72% | 0.78% | 0.00% | 6.54% | 19.83% | 1.67% |
Financials
FRO vs. DHT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontline Ltd. and DHT Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FRO vs. DHT - Profitability Comparison
FRO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a gross profit of 395.96M and revenue of 714.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.
DHT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 112.62M and revenue of 186.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.
FRO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported an operating income of 370.04M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.8%.
DHT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 107.66M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.7%.
FRO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Frontline Ltd. reported a net income of 559.12M and revenue of 714.24M, resulting in a net margin of 78.3%.
DHT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DHT Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 164.53M and revenue of 186.48M, resulting in a net margin of 88.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FRO and DHT have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FRO has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to DHT (9.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRO dropped -98.36% vs DHT's -97.12%.
FRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRO and DHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer