FRO vs. DHT

In the year-to-date period, FRO achieves a -26.90% return, which is significantly lower than DHT's -0.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FRO has underperformed DHT with an annualized return of 7.85%, while DHT has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Frontline Ltd. (FRO) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FRO Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the DHT Sharpe Ratio of -0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRO and DHT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.57%, more than DHT's 11.17% yield.

The maximum FRO drawdown since its inception was -98.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DHT drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRO and DHT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Frontline Ltd. (FRO) has a higher volatility of 15.27% compared to DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) at 8.90%. This indicates that FRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Frontline Ltd. and DHT Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.