FRIZ vs. LVHD
FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and LVHD (Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while LVHD is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS Low Volatility High Dividend Index. FRIZ is actively managed, while LVHD is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for LVHD.
Performance
FRIZ vs. LVHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than LVHD's 8.83% return.
FRIZ
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVHD
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 8.83%
- 6M
- 9.15%
- 1Y
- 12.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.98%
- 5Y*
- 6.47%
- 10Y*
- 8.20%
FRIZ vs. LVHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 2.78% | 3.14% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 8.83% | -1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIZ and LVHD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIZ vs. LVHD — Risk / Return Rank
FRIZ
LVHD
FRIZ vs. LVHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FRIZ | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.53 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.58 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
FRIZ vs. LVHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum LVHD drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and LVHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIZ | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -37.32% | +29.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -2.96% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -4.05% | +2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.44% | — |
Volatility
FRIZ vs. LVHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIZ | LVHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.23% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.76% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.15% | 9.61% | +0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 12.88% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.15% | 15.51% | -5.36% |
FRIZ vs. LVHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LVHD's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIZ vs. LVHD - Dividend Comparison
FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than LVHD's 3.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHD Legg Mason Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 3.34% | 3.35% | 4.23% | 3.55% | 3.30% | 2.56% | 3.27% | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.33% | 2.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIZ and LVHD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVHD is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVHD is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.
LVHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.34%, compared with 0.50% for FRIZ.
FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while LVHD is Volatility Hedged Equity. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.27% for LVHD.
Find the right allocation for FRIZ and LVHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer