FRIZ vs. FLCH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and FLCH (Franklin FTSE China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLCH is a China Equities fund tracking the FTSE China RIC Capped Index. FRIZ is actively managed, while FLCH is passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLCH.

Performance

FRIZ vs. FLCH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly higher than FLCH's -8.95% return.

FRIZ

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 2.39%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLCH

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -7.63%
• YTD: -8.95%
• 6M: -11.33%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 9.12%
• 5Y*: -5.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FRIZ vs. FLCH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF	2.78%	3.14%
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	-8.95%	-0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between FRIZ and FLCH is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

FRIZ vs. FLCH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLCH

FLCH Risk / Return Rank: 11
FLCH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
FLCH Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRIZ vs. FLCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin FTSE China ETF (FLCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FRIZ	FLCH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.19	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.01	+0.78

Drawdowns

FRIZ vs. FLCH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum FLCH drawdown of -62.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and FLCH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FRIZ	FLCH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.84%	-62.09%	+54.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.64%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-55.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.76%	-35.82%	+35.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.47%	-30.53%	+29.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FRIZ	FLCH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.87%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.15%	19.27%	-9.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.15%	29.60%	-19.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.15%	27.91%	-17.76%

FRIZ vs. FLCH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

FRIZ vs. FLCH - Dividend Comparison

FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than FLCH's 2.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF	2.59%	2.36%	2.87%	3.47%	2.69%	1.48%	0.91%	1.98%	1.92%	0.01%
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF	0.50%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FRIZ and FLCH in my portfolio?

FRIZ and FLCH have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FRIZ or FLCH?

On fees, FLCH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FRIZ or FLCH?

FLCH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FRIZ or FLCH?

FLCH has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.50% for FRIZ.

What is the main difference between FRIZ and FLCH?

FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while FLCH is China Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.19% for FLCH.