FRIZ vs. FLKR
FRIZ (Franklin Dividend Growth ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FRIZ is a Dividend fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. FRIZ is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FRIZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.
Performance
FRIZ vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRIZ achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 101.90% return.
FRIZ
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 1.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLKR
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 101.90%
- 6M
- 105.49%
- 1Y
- 174.55%
- 3Y*
- 48.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.90%
- 10Y*
- —
FRIZ vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 2.17% | 3.22% |
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 101.90% | 33.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRIZ and FLKR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRIZ vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank
FRIZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FLKR
FRIZ vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Dividend Growth ETF (FRIZ) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRIZ | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.53 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 25.97 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRIZ vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRIZ drawdown since its inception was -7.84%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRIZ and FLKR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRIZ | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.84% | -50.06% | +42.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -49.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -10.44% | +8.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.43% | -21.96% | +20.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.75% | — |
Volatility
FRIZ vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRIZ | FLKR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 28.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 45.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 48.56% | -38.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 30.59% | -20.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.97% | 28.92% | -18.95% |
FRIZ vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRIZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRIZ vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison
FRIZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than FLKR's 2.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF | 2.29% | 3.87% | 7.08% | 2.28% | 3.13% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 2.09% | 1.86% | 1.02% |
FRIZ Franklin Dividend Growth ETF | 0.82% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRIZ and FLKR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for FRIZ.
FLKR has the higher dividend yield at 2.29%, compared with 0.82% for FRIZ.
FRIZ is categorized as Dividend, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for FRIZ and 0.09% for FLKR.
Find the right allocation for FRIZ and FLKR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer