FOCT vs. PSQ
FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) and PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - FOCT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%). FOCT is actively managed, while PSQ is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FOCT returned 9.14%/yr vs -14.55%/yr for PSQ. At a correlation of -0.88, they often move in opposite directions. FOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for PSQ.
Performance
FOCT vs. PSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 6.65% return, which is significantly higher than PSQ's -16.45% return.
FOCT
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 6M
- 7.15%
- 1Y
- 20.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- —
PSQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -14.96%
- 1Y
- -26.29%
- 3Y*
- -18.98%
- 5Y*
- -14.55%
- 10Y*
- -19.23%
FOCT vs. PSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 6.65% | 14.92% | 9.62% | 17.81% | -7.59% | 13.13% | 6.38% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -16.45% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -32.01% | 36.40% | -24.84% | -10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOCT and PSQ is -0.91, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2020 | -0.88 |
The correlation between FOCT and PSQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.91 to -0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
FOCT vs. PSQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FOCT
PSQ
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FOCT
PSQ
-
Financial Services
FOCT
PSQ
Communication Services
FOCT
PSQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
FOCT
PSQ
-
Healthcare
FOCT
PSQ
-
Industrials
FOCT
PSQ
-
Consumer Defensive
FOCT
PSQ
-
Energy
FOCT
PSQ
-
Utilities
FOCT
PSQ
-
Real Estate
FOCT
PSQ
-
Basic Materials
FOCT
PSQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOCT vs. PSQ — Risk / Return Rank
FOCT
PSQ
FOCT vs. PSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOCT | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.74 | +0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | -0.98 | +4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.32 | -2.12 | +19.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOCT | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53 | -1.65 | +4.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | -0.65 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | -0.76 | +1.74 |
Drawdowns
FOCT vs. PSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum PSQ drawdown of -98.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and PSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOCT | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -98.26% | +84.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.74% | -26.93% | +21.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.06% | -49.65% | +36.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.07% | -60.91% | +46.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | -98.25% | +98.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -73.97% | +71.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 12.41% | -11.25% |
Volatility
FOCT vs. PSQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) is 1.22%, while ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that FOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOCT | PSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.22% | 4.50% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | 12.14% | -6.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.99% | 16.01% | -8.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 22.43% | -11.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.89% | 22.25% | -11.36% |
FOCT vs. PSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PSQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOCT vs. PSQ - Dividend Comparison
FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.24% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOCT and PSQ have a correlation of -0.91, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSQ has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FOCT (1.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCT dropped -14.07% vs PSQ's -98.26%.
On 5-year performance, FOCT leads with 9.14% vs -14.55% for PSQ. On fees, FOCT is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FOCT has been the lower-risk option at 1.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FOCT has performed better with a 9.14% return vs -14.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FOCT is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 0.00% for FOCT.
FOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while PSQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FOCT and 0.95% for PSQ.
FOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs -1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOCT and PSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer