FOCT vs. VOOG
FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) and VOOG (Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOCT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while VOOG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. FOCT is actively managed, while VOOG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FOCT returned 9.04%/yr vs 14.71%/yr for VOOG. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOOG.
Performance
FOCT vs. VOOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than VOOG's 11.32% return.
FOCT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- 1Y
- 19.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- —
VOOG
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 31.59%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 14.71%
- 10Y*
- 18.28%
FOCT vs. VOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 6.45% | 14.92% | 9.62% | 17.81% | -7.59% | 13.13% | 4.94% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 11.32% | 22.11% | 35.89% | 29.96% | -29.48% | 31.95% | 6.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOCT and VOOG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FOCT and VOOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
FOCT vs. VOOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FOCT
VOOG
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FOCT
VOOG
Financial Services
FOCT
VOOG
Communication Services
FOCT
VOOG
Consumer Cyclical
FOCT
VOOG
Healthcare
FOCT
VOOG
Industrials
FOCT
VOOG
Consumer Defensive
FOCT
VOOG
Energy
FOCT
VOOG
Utilities
FOCT
VOOG
Real Estate
FOCT
VOOG
Basic Materials
FOCT
VOOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOCT vs. VOOG — Risk / Return Rank
FOCT
VOOG
FOCT vs. VOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOCT | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.33 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 2.31 | +1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 9.24 | +7.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOCT vs. VOOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum VOOG drawdown of -32.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and VOOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOCT | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -32.73% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.74% | -13.71% | +7.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.06% | -22.18% | +9.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.07% | -32.73% | +18.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -3.22% | +2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -4.96% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 3.43% | -2.25% |
Volatility
FOCT vs. VOOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) is 2.10%, while Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF (VOOG) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that FOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOCT | VOOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 6.83% | -4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 13.68% | -7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 16.89% | -8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 21.35% | -10.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 20.82% | -9.94% |
FOCT vs. VOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than VOOG's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOCT vs. VOOG - Dividend Comparison
FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOOG Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.45% | 0.49% | 0.49% | 1.12% | 0.93% | 0.53% | 0.88% | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, FOCT and VOOG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VOOG has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to FOCT (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCT dropped -14.07% vs VOOG's -32.73%.
On 5-year performance, VOOG leads with 14.71% vs 9.04% for FOCT. On fees, VOOG is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FOCT has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VOOG has performed better with a 14.71% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOOG is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FOCT.
VOOG has the higher dividend yield at 0.45%, compared with 0.00% for FOCT.
FOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while VOOG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FOCT and 0.07% for VOOG.
FOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOCT and VOOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer