FOCT vs. HDMV
FOCT (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October) and HDMV (First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FOCT is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by FT Vest, while HDMV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FOCT returned 9.04%/yr vs 6.88%/yr for HDMV. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FOCT charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for HDMV.
Performance
FOCT vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly higher than HDMV's 5.77% return.
FOCT
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 6.45%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- 1Y
- 19.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.04%
- 10Y*
- —
HDMV
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 12.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- —
FOCT vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 6.45% | 14.92% | 9.62% | 17.81% | -7.59% | 13.13% | 4.94% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 5.77% | 29.31% | 2.99% | 9.62% | -11.47% | 7.39% | 6.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between FOCT and HDMV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FOCT and HDMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FOCT vs. HDMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FOCT
HDMV
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FOCT
HDMV
Financial Services
FOCT
HDMV
Communication Services
FOCT
HDMV
Consumer Cyclical
FOCT
HDMV
Healthcare
FOCT
HDMV
Industrials
FOCT
HDMV
Consumer Defensive
FOCT
HDMV
Energy
FOCT
HDMV
Utilities
FOCT
HDMV
Real Estate
FOCT
HDMV
Basic Materials
FOCT
HDMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FOCT vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank
FOCT
HDMV
FOCT vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FOCT | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.20 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 1.40 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.95 | 4.04 | +12.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FOCT vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum HDMV drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and HDMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOCT | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -32.01% | +17.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.74% | -8.73% | +2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.06% | -10.33% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.07% | -24.11% | +10.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -4.66% | +4.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -6.76% | +4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.18% | 3.01% | -1.83% |
Volatility
FOCT vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) is 2.10%, while First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that FOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FOCT | HDMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 3.38% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.17% | 9.70% | -3.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.05% | 11.42% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.11% | 12.08% | -0.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 13.23% | -2.35% |
FOCT vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FOCT vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison
FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HDMV First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF | 4.63% | 5.09% | 3.24% | 3.14% | 3.53% | 3.11% | 1.45% | 3.63% | 2.88% | 3.23% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FOCT and HDMV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDMV has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FOCT (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCT dropped -14.07% vs HDMV's -32.01%.
On 5-year performance, FOCT leads with 9.04% vs 6.88% for HDMV. On fees, HDMV is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FOCT has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FOCT has performed better with a 9.04% return vs 6.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HDMV is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FOCT.
HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 0.00% for FOCT.
FOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while HDMV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FOCT and 0.80% for HDMV.
FOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FOCT and HDMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer