PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOCT vs. HDMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOCT vs. HDMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly higher than HDMV's 5.77% return.


FOCT

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.56%
YTD
6.45%
6M
6.34%
1Y
19.91%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*

HDMV

1D
0.42%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
5.77%
6M
6.21%
1Y
12.13%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
6.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOCT vs. HDMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FOCT
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October
6.45%14.92%9.62%17.81%-7.59%13.13%4.94%
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
5.77%29.31%2.99%9.62%-11.47%7.39%6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FOCT and HDMV is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2020

0.58

The correlation between FOCT and HDMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FOCT vs. HDMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FOCT
HDMV

Technology

39.0%
0.9%

Financial Services

11.1%
24.5%

Communication Services

10.6%
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
2.7%

Healthcare

8.3%
3.2%

Industrials

7.8%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
13.1%

Energy

3.1%
1.7%

Utilities

2.1%
14.4%

Real Estate

1.8%
13.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.0%

Technology

FOCT
39.0%
HDMV
0.9%

Financial Services

FOCT
11.1%
HDMV
24.5%

Communication Services

FOCT
10.6%
HDMV
9.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FOCT
9.9%
HDMV
2.7%

Healthcare

FOCT
8.3%
HDMV
3.2%

Industrials

FOCT
7.8%
HDMV
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

FOCT
4.5%
HDMV
13.1%

Energy

FOCT
3.1%
HDMV
1.7%

Utilities

FOCT
2.1%
HDMV
14.4%

Real Estate

FOCT
1.8%
HDMV
13.7%

Basic Materials

FOCT
1.7%
HDMV
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOCT vs. HDMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOCT
FOCT Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FOCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

HDMV
HDMV Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HDMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HDMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDMV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOCT vs. HDMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOCTHDMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.20

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

1.40

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.95

4.04

+12.92

FOCT vs. HDMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is higher than the HDMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCT and HDMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOCT vs. HDMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum HDMV drawdown of -32.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and HDMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOCTHDMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.07%

-32.01%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-8.73%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.06%

-10.33%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.07%

-24.11%

+10.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-4.66%

+4.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.24%

-6.76%

+4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.18%

3.01%

-1.83%

Volatility

FOCT vs. HDMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) is 2.10%, while First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF (HDMV) has a volatility of 3.38%. This indicates that FOCT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOCTHDMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

3.38%

-1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.17%

9.70%

-3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.05%

11.42%

-3.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.11%

12.08%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.88%

13.23%

-2.35%

FOCT vs. HDMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than HDMV's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOCT vs. HDMV - Dividend Comparison

FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FOCT
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDMV
First Trust Horizon Managed Volatility Developed Intl ETF
4.63%5.09%3.24%3.14%3.53%3.11%1.45%3.63%2.88%3.23%0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOCT and HDMV have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDMV has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to FOCT (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOCT dropped -14.07% vs HDMV's -32.01%.

On 5-year performance, FOCT leads with 9.04% vs 6.88% for HDMV. On fees, HDMV is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FOCT has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FOCT has performed better with a 9.04% return vs 6.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HDMV is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FOCT.

HDMV has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 0.00% for FOCT.

FOCT is categorized as Defined Outcome, while HDMV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FOCT and 0.80% for HDMV.

FOCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOCT and HDMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer