FOCT vs. ACWV

In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a 0.28% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 8.11% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF- October (FOCT) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FOCT Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is lower than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOCT and ACWV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.

The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and ACWV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF- October (FOCT) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) have volatilities of 3.25% and 3.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.