FOCT vs. ACWV
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV).
FOCT and ACWV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FOCT is an actively managed fund by FT Vest. It was launched on Oct 16, 2020. ACWV is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World Minimum Volatility (USD). It was launched on Oct 18, 2011.
Performance
FOCT vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FOCT vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | -2.67% | 14.92% | 9.62% | 17.81% | -7.59% | 13.13% | 6.38% |
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 0.64% | 11.04% | 11.38% | 8.23% | -10.36% | 13.97% | 5.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FOCT achieves a -2.67% return, which is significantly lower than ACWV's 0.64% return.
FOCT
- 1D
- 1.94%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- YTD
- -2.67%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 14.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 7.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ACWV
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -4.54%
- YTD
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 4.86%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 6.10%
- 10Y*
- 7.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FOCT vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FOCT has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FOCT vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank
FOCT
ACWV
FOCT vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FOCT | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.19 | 0.45 | +0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.77 | 0.69 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.10 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 0.73 | +1.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.23 | 3.16 | +6.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FOCT | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.19 | 0.45 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.60 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.70 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FOCT and ACWV is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FOCT vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison
FOCT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOCT FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ACWV iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF | 2.07% | 2.09% | 2.33% | 2.41% | 2.18% | 1.92% | 1.77% | 2.54% | 2.32% | 2.04% | 2.56% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
FOCT vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FOCT drawdown since its inception was -14.07%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOCT and ACWV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FOCT | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.07% | -28.82% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -7.56% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.07% | -18.14% | +4.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -4.54% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.31% | -3.11% | +0.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.73% | -0.07% |
Volatility
FOCT vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison
FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - October (FOCT) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 3.24%. This indicates that FOCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FOCT | ACWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 3.24% | +0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.44% | 5.54% | +0.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 10.76% | +1.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.05% | 10.25% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.00% | 12.31% | -1.31% |