PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOA vs. ESOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FOA vs. ESOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) and Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOA achieves a 4.83% return, which is significantly lower than ESOA's 101.74% return.


FOA

1D
-1.36%
1M
25.40%
6M
2.84%
YTD
4.83%
1Y
10.64%
3Y*
9.75%
5Y*
-17.67%
10Y*

ESOA

1D
-2.55%
1M
-1.53%
6M
99.30%
YTD
101.74%
1Y
70.72%
3Y*
79.60%
5Y*
49.79%
10Y*
28.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOA vs. ESOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FOA
Finance Of America Companies Inc.
4.83%-13.90%155.64%-13.39%-68.01%-61.83%3.69%3.40%
ESOA
Energy Services Of America Corp
101.74%-34.42%111.44%140.93%-22.02%223.53%32.47%-26.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FOA and ESOA is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2019

0.09

Over the past year, FOA and ESOA have become more correlated (0.31) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FOA:

$225.67M

ESOA:

$306.21M

EPS

FOA:

$5.13

ESOA:

$0.54

PE Ratio

FOA:

4.94

ESOA:

30.15

PEG Ratio

FOA:

0.04

ESOA:

0.70

PS Ratio

FOA:

0.12

ESOA:

0.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

FOA:

$1.15B

ESOA:

$440.96M

Gross Profit (TTM)

FOA:

$623.72M

ESOA:

$52.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

FOA:

$1.78B

ESOA:

$27.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOA vs. ESOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOA
FOA Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

ESOA
ESOA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
ESOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESOA Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
ESOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESOA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOA vs. ESOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) and Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOAESOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.24

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

2.28

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.43

4.88

-4.45

FOA vs. ESOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOA Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the ESOA Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOA and ESOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOA vs. ESOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOA drawdown since its inception was -96.13%, which is greater than ESOA's maximum drawdown of -76.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOA and ESOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOAESOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.13%

-76.67%

-19.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.07%

-31.16%

-13.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.72%

-57.43%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.43%

-57.43%

-36.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.16%

-15.15%

-63.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.70%

-32.89%

-24.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.83%

14.53%

+10.30%

Volatility

FOA vs. ESOA - Volatility Comparison

Finance Of America Companies Inc. (FOA) has a higher volatility of 18.22% compared to Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) at 15.40%. This indicates that FOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOAESOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.22%

15.40%

+2.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.59%

48.65%

-12.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.05%

63.03%

-12.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.88%

75.94%

+0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.45%

96.09%

-30.64%

Dividends

FOA vs. ESOA - Dividend Comparison

FOA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ESOA
Energy Services Of America Corp
0.79%1.47%0.24%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.49%0.00%5.88%
FOA
Finance Of America Companies Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FOA vs. ESOA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Finance Of America Companies Inc. and Energy Services Of America Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
93.17M
(FOA) Total Revenue
(ESOA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FOA and ESOA have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FOA has higher volatility (18.22%) compared to ESOA (15.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOA dropped -96.13% vs ESOA's -76.67%.

ESOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOA and ESOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer