PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
ESOA vs. ELF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

ESOA vs. ELF

Last updated May 11, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF).

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ESOA or ELF.

Correlation

The correlation between ESOA and ELF is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

ESOA vs. ELF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ESOA:

0.45

ELF:

-0.88

Sortino Ratio

ESOA:

0.96

ELF:

-1.25

Omega Ratio

ESOA:

1.12

ELF:

0.85

Calmar Ratio

ESOA:

0.32

ELF:

-0.77

Martin Ratio

ESOA:

0.64

ELF:

-1.25

Ulcer Index

ESOA:

28.85%

ELF:

47.50%

Daily Std Dev

ESOA:

82.22%

ELF:

69.70%

Max Drawdown

ESOA:

-97.30%

ELF:

-77.09%

Current Drawdown

ESOA:

-49.74%

ELF:

-69.34%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ESOA:

$157.85M

ELF:

$3.83B

EPS

ESOA:

$1.44

ELF:

$1.67

PE Ratio

ESOA:

6.54

ELF:

40.02

PEG Ratio

ESOA:

0.00

ELF:

2.03

PS Ratio

ESOA:

0.44

ELF:

2.94

PB Ratio

ESOA:

2.58

ELF:

4.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

ESOA:

$291.23M

ELF:

$980.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

ESOA:

$43.14M

ELF:

$698.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

ESOA:

$41.94M

ELF:

$137.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a -25.12% return, which is significantly higher than ELF's -46.76% return.

ESOA

YTD

-25.12%

1M

5.25%

6M

-28.81%

1Y

39.03%

5Y*

69.01%

10Y*

28.51%

ELF

YTD

-46.76%

1M

24.26%

6M

-44.39%

1Y

-59.27%

5Y*

37.74%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ESOA vs. ELF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESOA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ESOA is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ESOA is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ESOA is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ESOA is 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ESOA is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ESOA is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
ELF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ELF is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ELF is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ELF is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ELF is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ELF is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ELF is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ESOA vs. ELF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ESOA Sharpe Ratio is 0.45, which is higher than the ELF Sharpe Ratio of -0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESOA and ELF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Dividends

ESOA vs. ELF - Dividend Comparison

ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, while ELF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
ESOA
Energy Services Of America Corp		0.64%0.24%1.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%6.49%0.00%5.88%3.65%
ELF
e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ESOA vs. ELF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than ELF's maximum drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and ELF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Loading data...

Volatility

ESOA vs. ELF - Volatility Comparison

Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) has a higher volatility of 16.19% compared to e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) at 14.68%. This indicates that ESOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...

Financials

ESOA vs. ELF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Services Of America Corp and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.

Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities

0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
100.65M
355.32M
(ESOA) Total Revenue
(ELF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

ESOA vs. ELF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Services Of America Corp and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual
0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
10.2%
71.3%
(ESOA) Gross Margin
(ELF) Gross Margin
ESOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 10.26M and revenue of 100.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.2%.

ELF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 253.31M and revenue of 355.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.3%.

ESOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 1.65M and revenue of 100.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.6%.

ELF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 35.09M and revenue of 355.32M, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

ESOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 853.73K and revenue of 100.65M, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.

ELF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 35.30M and revenue of 355.32M, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.