ESOA vs. ELF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF).

Performance

ESOA vs. ELF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESOA vs. ELF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp	61.08%	-34.42%	111.44%	140.93%	-22.02%	223.53%	32.47%	-30.56%	38.82%	-36.06%
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.	-20.29%	-39.43%	-13.02%	161.01%	66.52%	31.84%	56.17%	86.26%	-61.18%	-22.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ESOA : $219.83M ELF : $3.65B
EPS ESOA : $0.13 ELF : $1.76
PE Ratio ESOA : 98.18 ELF : 34.37
PEG Ratio ESOA : 2.28 ELF : 0.28
PS Ratio ESOA : 0.52 ELF : 2.35
PB Ratio ESOA : 3.63 ELF : 3.14
Total Revenue (TTM) ESOA : $424.47M ELF : $1.52B
Gross Profit (TTM) ESOA : $42.51M ELF : $1.07B
EBITDA (TTM) ESOA : $17.04M ELF : $220.91M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 61.08% return, which is significantly higher than ELF's -20.29% return.

ESOA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -15.75%
• YTD: 61.08%
• 6M: 28.01%
• 1Y: 40.62%
• 3Y*: 80.99%
• 5Y*: 44.47%
• 10Y*: 25.62%

ELF

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -34.16%
• YTD: -20.29%
• 6M: -54.25%
• 1Y: -3.47%
• 3Y*: -9.71%
• 5Y*: 17.61%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ESOA vs. ELF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESOA

ESOA Risk / Return Rank: 65
ESOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ESOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ESOA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ESOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ESOA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

ELF

ELF Risk / Return Rank: 41
ELF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
ELF Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
ELF Omega Ratio Rank: 44
ELF Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
ELF Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESOA vs. ELF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESOA	ELF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	-0.05	+0.64
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	0.46	+0.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.07	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	-0.11	+1.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.60	-0.22	+2.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESOA vs. ELF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESOA Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the ELF Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESOA and ELF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESOA	ELF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	-0.05	+0.64
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.31	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.17	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between ESOA and ELF is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ESOA vs. ELF - Dividend Comparison

ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, while ELF has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp	0.91%	1.47%	0.24%	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	6.49%	0.00%	5.88%
ELF e.l.f. Beauty, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ESOA vs. ELF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, roughly equal to the maximum ELF drawdown of -77.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and ELF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESOA	ELF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.67%	-77.09%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.16%	-59.54%	+28.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.43%	-77.09%	+19.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.09%	-72.20%	+43.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.30%	-31.58%	-1.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.34%	30.06%	-14.72%

Volatility

ESOA vs. ELF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) is 14.49%, while e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. (ELF) has a volatility of 18.98%. This indicates that ESOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ELF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESOA	ELF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.49%	18.98%	-4.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.25%	59.83%	-14.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.73%	73.99%	-5.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.46%	56.55%	+19.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	96.09%	55.20%	+40.89%

Financials

ESOA vs. ELF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Services Of America Corp and e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ESOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 13.99M and revenue of 114.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

ELF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a gross profit of 347.50M and revenue of 489.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.0%.

ESOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 4.91M and revenue of 114.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

ELF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported an operating income of 67.54M and revenue of 489.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 13.8%.

ESOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 2.71M and revenue of 114.11M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

ELF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, e.l.f. Beauty, Inc. reported a net income of 39.38M and revenue of 489.51M, resulting in a net margin of 8.0%.