ESOA vs. BMA

In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 168.07% return, which is significantly lower than BMA's 277.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ESOA has outperformed BMA with an annualized return of 36.83%, while BMA has yielded a comparatively lower 12.18% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ESOA Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is lower than the BMA Sharpe Ratio of 4.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESOA and BMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than BMA's 6.10% yield.

The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -97.30%, which is greater than BMA's maximum drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and BMA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) has a higher volatility of 27.31% compared to Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) at 20.86%. This indicates that ESOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Services Of America Corp and Banco Macro S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.