ESOA vs. BMA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA).

Performance

ESOA vs. BMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESOA vs. BMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp	61.08%	-34.42%	111.44%	140.93%	-22.02%	223.53%	32.47%	-30.56%	38.82%	-36.06%
BMA Banco Macro S.A.	-12.98%	-3.55%	277.79%	91.62%	27.04%	-9.96%	-57.05%	-14.00%	-60.72%	81.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ESOA : $219.83M BMA : $4.95T
EPS ESOA : $0.13 BMA : $10.77
PE Ratio ESOA : 98.18 BMA : 7.18
PEG Ratio ESOA : 2.28 BMA : 0.02
PS Ratio ESOA : 0.52 BMA : 0.34
PB Ratio ESOA : 3.63 BMA : 1.37
Total Revenue (TTM) ESOA : $424.47M BMA : $4.81T
Gross Profit (TTM) ESOA : $42.51M BMA : $3.27T
EBITDA (TTM) ESOA : $17.04M BMA : $407.74B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 61.08% return, which is significantly higher than BMA's -12.98% return. Over the past 10 years, ESOA has outperformed BMA with an annualized return of 25.62%, while BMA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.24% annualized return.

ESOA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -15.75%
• YTD: 61.08%
• 6M: 28.01%
• 1Y: 40.62%
• 3Y*: 80.99%
• 5Y*: 44.47%
• 10Y*: 25.62%

BMA

• 1D: 10.45%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: -12.98%
• 6M: 88.14%
• 1Y: 7.55%
• 3Y*: 77.60%
• 5Y*: 52.36%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ESOA vs. BMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESOA

ESOA Risk / Return Rank: 65
ESOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ESOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ESOA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ESOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ESOA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

BMA

BMA Risk / Return Rank: 46
BMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
BMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BMA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
BMA Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESOA vs. BMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and Banco Macro S.A. (BMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESOA	BMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	0.10	+0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	0.80	+0.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.10	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	0.06	+1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.60	0.14	+2.46
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESOA vs. BMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESOA Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the BMA Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESOA and BMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESOA	BMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	0.10	+0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	0.89	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.10	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.18	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between ESOA and BMA is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ESOA vs. BMA - Dividend Comparison

ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than BMA's 4.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp	0.91%	1.47%	0.24%	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	6.49%	0.00%	5.88%	0.00%
BMA Banco Macro S.A.	4.24%	2.38%	6.10%	7.75%	7.28%	0.00%	0.00%	6.20%	5.05%	0.65%	1.53%

Drawdowns

ESOA vs. BMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, smaller than the maximum BMA drawdown of -91.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and BMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESOA	BMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.67%	-91.66%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.16%	-58.48%	+27.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.43%	-65.40%	+7.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.62%	-91.66%	+22.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.09%	-29.90%	+0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.30%	-44.99%	+11.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.34%	26.44%	-11.10%

Volatility

ESOA vs. BMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) is 14.49%, while Banco Macro S.A. (BMA) has a volatility of 16.97%. This indicates that ESOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESOA	BMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.49%	16.97%	-2.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.25%	51.53%	-6.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.73%	76.34%	-7.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.46%	59.30%	+17.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	96.09%	62.19%	+33.90%

Financials

ESOA vs. BMA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Services Of America Corp and Banco Macro S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ESOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 13.99M and revenue of 114.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

BMA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a gross profit of 802.92B and revenue of 802.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

ESOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 4.91M and revenue of 114.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

BMA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported an operating income of 488.39B and revenue of 802.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 60.8%.

ESOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 2.71M and revenue of 114.11M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

BMA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Banco Macro S.A. reported a net income of 69.19B and revenue of 802.92B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.