ESOA vs. EME

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME).

Performance

ESOA vs. EME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESOA vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp	61.08%	-34.42%	111.44%	140.93%	-22.02%	223.53%	32.47%	-30.56%	38.82%	-36.06%
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	20.75%	35.05%	111.27%	46.03%	16.81%	39.93%	6.47%	45.18%	-26.68%	16.09%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ESOA : $219.83M EME : $33.26B
EPS ESOA : $0.13 EME : $28.22
PE Ratio ESOA : 98.18 EME : 26.17
PEG Ratio ESOA : 2.28 EME : 0.61
PS Ratio ESOA : 0.52 EME : 1.96
PB Ratio ESOA : 3.63 EME : 9.05
Total Revenue (TTM) ESOA : $424.47M EME : $16.99B
Gross Profit (TTM) ESOA : $42.51M EME : $3.33B
EBITDA (TTM) ESOA : $17.04M EME : $1.84B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 61.08% return, which is significantly higher than EME's 20.75% return. Over the past 10 years, ESOA has underperformed EME with an annualized return of 25.62%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 31.80% annualized return.

ESOA

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -15.75%
• YTD: 61.08%
• 6M: 28.01%
• 1Y: 40.62%
• 3Y*: 80.99%
• 5Y*: 44.47%
• 10Y*: 25.62%

EME

• 1D: 5.31%
• 1M: 1.89%
• YTD: 20.75%
• 6M: 13.78%
• 1Y: 100.16%
• 3Y*: 66.05%
• 5Y*: 45.89%
• 10Y*: 31.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ESOA vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESOA

ESOA Risk / Return Rank: 65
ESOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
ESOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
ESOA Omega Ratio Rank: 63
ESOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
ESOA Martin Ratio Rank: 65

EME

EME Risk / Return Rank: 91
EME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
EME Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
EME Omega Ratio Rank: 92
EME Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
EME Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESOA vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESOA	EME	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	2.50	-1.91
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.80	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.42	-0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.28	3.96	-2.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.60	10.24	-7.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESOA vs. EME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESOA Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the EME Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESOA and EME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESOA	EME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59	2.50	-1.91
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.59	1.40	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.97	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.59	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between ESOA and EME is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ESOA vs. EME - Dividend Comparison

ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, more than EME's 0.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp	0.91%	1.47%	0.24%	1.84%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	6.49%	0.00%	5.88%	0.00%	0.00%
EME EMCOR Group, Inc.	0.16%	0.16%	0.20%	0.32%	0.36%	0.41%	0.35%	0.37%	0.54%	0.39%	0.45%	0.67%

Drawdowns

ESOA vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and EME.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESOA	EME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.67%	-70.56%	-6.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.16%	-25.15%	-6.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.43%	-36.19%	-21.24%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-69.62%	-48.00%	-21.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.09%	-9.16%	-19.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.30%	-15.43%	-17.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.34%	9.72%	+5.62%

Volatility

ESOA vs. EME - Volatility Comparison

Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) has a higher volatility of 14.49% compared to EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) at 11.59%. This indicates that ESOA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESOA	EME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.49%	11.59%	+2.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.25%	32.46%	+12.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.73%	40.22%	+28.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	76.46%	32.90%	+43.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	96.09%	32.75%	+63.34%

Financials

ESOA vs. EME - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Energy Services Of America Corp and EMCOR Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ESOA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 13.99M and revenue of 114.11M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.3%.

EME - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 935.60M and revenue of 4.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.7%.

ESOA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 4.91M and revenue of 114.11M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.

EME - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 531.64M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

ESOA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 2.71M and revenue of 114.11M, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

EME - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 431.79M and revenue of 4.52B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.