ESOA vs. EME
ESOA (Energy Services Of America Corp) and EME (EMCOR Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Engineering & Construction industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, ESOA returned 26.79%/yr vs 31.05%/yr for EME. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ESOA vs. EME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESOA achieves a 76.78% return, which is significantly higher than EME's 30.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ESOA has underperformed EME with an annualized return of 26.79%, while EME has yielded a comparatively higher 31.05% annualized return.
ESOA
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -19.48%
- 6M
- 60.30%
- YTD
- 76.78%
- 1Y
- 42.00%
- 3Y*
- 73.16%
- 5Y*
- 49.28%
- 10Y*
- 26.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.73%
EME
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 10.75%
- YTD
- 30.55%
- 1Y
- 27.91%
- 3Y*
- 55.31%
- 5Y*
- 46.08%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.21%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $368.60M | $378.28M | $358.64M | |
| $2.60M | $2.19M | $2.55M |
ESOA vs. EME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp | 76.78% | -34.42% | 111.44% | 140.93% | -22.02% | 223.53% | 32.47% | -30.56% | 38.82% | -36.06% |
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 30.55% | 35.05% | 111.27% | 46.03% | 16.81% | 39.93% | 6.47% | 45.18% | -26.68% | 16.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between ESOA and EME is 0.40, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2012 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, ESOA and EME have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
ESOA:
$268.33M
EME:
$35.44B
ESOA:
$0.54
EME:
$42.53
ESOA:
26.42
EME:
18.75
ESOA:
0.61
EME:
0.44
ESOA:
0.55
EME:
1.45
ESOA:
$440.96M
EME:
$18.60B
ESOA:
$52.66M
EME:
$3.66B
ESOA:
$27.20M
EME:
$2.18B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ESOA vs. EME — Risk / Return Rank
ESOA
EME
ESOA vs. EME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) and EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ESOA | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 0.96 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.25 | 2.30 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ESOA vs. EME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESOA drawdown since its inception was -76.67%, which is greater than EME's maximum drawdown of -70.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESOA and EME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESOA | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.67% | -70.56% | -6.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.16% | -28.71% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.43% | -36.19% | -21.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.43% | -36.19% | -21.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -69.62% | -48.00% | -21.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.65% | -15.46% | -10.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.83% | -15.37% | -17.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.07% | 11.91% | +3.16% |
Volatility
ESOA vs. EME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Energy Services Of America Corp (ESOA) is 13.37%, while EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) has a volatility of 21.02%. This indicates that ESOA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ESOA | EME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.37% | 21.02% | -7.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.65% | 33.40% | +16.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.68% | 44.13% | +18.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.82% | 34.90% | +40.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 95.97% | 33.77% | +62.20% |
Dividends
ESOA vs. EME - Dividend Comparison
ESOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, more than EME's 0.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EME EMCOR Group, Inc. | 0.18% | 0.16% | 0.20% | 0.32% | 0.36% | 0.41% | 0.35% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.67% |
ESOA Energy Services Of America Corp | 0.90% | 1.47% | 0.24% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.49% | 0.00% | 5.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
ESOA vs. EME - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energy Services Of America Corp and EMCOR Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ESOA vs. EME - Profitability Comparison
ESOA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a gross profit of 10.23M and revenue of 93.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.0%.
EME - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 5.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.8%.
ESOA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported an operating income of 1.06M and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
EME - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 547.34M and revenue of 5.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
ESOA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Energy Services Of America Corp reported a net income of 215.55K and revenue of 93.17M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
EME - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, EMCOR Group, Inc. reported a net income of 403.69M and revenue of 5.15B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ESOA and EME have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EME has higher volatility (21.02%) compared to ESOA (13.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ESOA dropped -76.67% vs EME's -70.56%.
EME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.62 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ESOA and EME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer