FNK vs. USVM
FNK (First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNK is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index, while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FNK returned 6.97%/yr vs 9.74%/yr for USVM. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNK charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
FNK vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNK achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 15.26% return.
FNK
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 7.22%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 19.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- 9.29%
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
FNK vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 7.22% | 5.65% | 6.65% | 21.03% | -7.24% | 33.60% | 1.23% | 20.56% | -14.72% | 4.97% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNK and USVM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FNK and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNK vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNK
USVM
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Technology
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Financial Services
FNK
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
FNK
USVM
Industrials
FNK
USVM
Energy
FNK
USVM
Real Estate
FNK
USVM
Technology
FNK
USVM
Healthcare
FNK
USVM
Utilities
FNK
USVM
Basic Materials
FNK
USVM
Consumer Defensive
FNK
USVM
Communication Services
FNK
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNK vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
FNK
USVM
FNK vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNK | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 2.05 | -0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 2.98 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.36 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 3.66 | -1.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | 13.76 | -7.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNK | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 2.05 | -0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.50 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.49 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
FNK vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNK drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNK and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNK | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.70% | -42.38% | -8.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.13% | -8.36% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.16% | -24.34% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.16% | -25.27% | +0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -0.57% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.84% | -7.90% | +1.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 2.22% | +0.93% |
Volatility
FNK vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) is 3.53%, while VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that FNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNK | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.53% | 4.50% | -0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.69% | 10.73% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.36% | 14.93% | +0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.04% | 19.65% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.86% | 22.01% | +1.85% |
FNK vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FNK vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
FNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNK First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund | 1.56% | 1.53% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 1.27% | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.76% | 1.40% | 1.38% | 1.45% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, FNK and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USVM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FNK (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNK dropped -50.70% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 6.97% for FNK. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FNK has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.56% for FNK.
FNK is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNK and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNK and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer