PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNK vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNK vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNK achieves a 7.22% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 15.26% return.


FNK

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.68%
YTD
7.22%
6M
7.56%
1Y
19.55%
3Y*
13.11%
5Y*
6.97%
10Y*
9.29%

USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNK vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
7.22%5.65%6.65%21.03%-7.24%33.60%1.23%20.56%-14.72%4.97%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FNK and USVM is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.89

The correlation between FNK and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNK vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FNK
USVM

Financial Services

25.2%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

19.0%
11.1%

Industrials

12.8%
12.1%

Energy

8.4%
4.4%

Real Estate

7.5%
11.9%

Technology

7.1%
11.6%

Healthcare

5.3%
11.0%

Utilities

4.4%
6.4%

Basic Materials

4.0%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
5.0%

Communication Services

1.3%
2.8%

Financial Services

FNK
25.2%
USVM
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FNK
19.0%
USVM
11.1%

Industrials

FNK
12.8%
USVM
12.1%

Energy

FNK
8.4%
USVM
4.4%

Real Estate

FNK
7.5%
USVM
11.9%

Technology

FNK
7.1%
USVM
11.6%

Healthcare

FNK
5.3%
USVM
11.0%

Utilities

FNK
4.4%
USVM
6.4%

Basic Materials

FNK
4.0%
USVM
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

FNK
3.5%
USVM
5.0%

Communication Services

FNK
1.3%
USVM
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNK vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNK
FNK Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
FNK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNK Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FNK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNK Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNK vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FNKUSVMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.29

2.05

-0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.02

2.98

-0.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

3.66

-1.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.23

13.76

-7.53

FNK vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNK Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNK and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FNKUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

2.05

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.50

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.49

-0.09

Drawdowns

FNK vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNK drawdown since its inception was -50.70%, which is greater than USVM's maximum drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNK and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNKUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.70%

-42.38%

-8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.13%

-8.36%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.16%

-24.34%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.16%

-25.27%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-0.57%

-1.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.84%

-7.90%

+1.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.22%

+0.93%

Volatility

FNK vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (FNK) is 3.53%, while VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that FNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNKUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

4.50%

-0.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.69%

10.73%

-1.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.36%

14.93%

+0.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.04%

19.65%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.86%

22.01%

+1.85%

FNK vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNK has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNK vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

FNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than USVM's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNK
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
1.56%1.53%1.63%1.76%1.66%1.27%1.61%1.82%1.76%1.40%1.38%1.45%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, FNK and USVM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

USVM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to FNK (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNK dropped -50.70% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 6.97% for FNK. On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FNK has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 6.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNK.

USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.56% for FNK.

FNK is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while USVM is Momentum. FNK tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Value Index, while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FNK and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNK and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer