FNGU vs. NRGU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU).

FNGU and NRGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018. NRGU is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index (-300%). It was launched on Apr 9, 2019. Both FNGU and NRGU are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FNGU vs. NRGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FNGU vs. NRGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	-35.43%	4.24%
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	139.49%	-33.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNGU achieves a -35.43% return, which is significantly lower than NRGU's 139.49% return.

FNGU

• 1D: 4.35%
• 1M: -14.02%
• YTD: -35.43%
• 6M: -44.05%
• 1Y: 17.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NRGU

• 1D: -10.75%
• 1M: 24.81%
• YTD: 139.49%
• 6M: 107.68%
• 1Y: 69.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNGU vs. NRGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNGU and NRGU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

FNGU

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN

NRGU

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

FNGU vs. NRGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 23
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 28
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 19

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 45
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNGU vs. NRGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNGU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.23	0.79	-0.56
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	1.48	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.21	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.38	1.29	-0.92
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	2.64	-1.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNGU vs. NRGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNGU Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the NRGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNGU and NRGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNGU	NRGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23	0.79	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.37	0.61	-0.99

Correlation

The correlation between FNGU and NRGU is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FNGU vs. NRGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither FNGU nor NRGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FNGU vs. NRGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNGU drawdown since its inception was -60.84%, which is greater than NRGU's maximum drawdown of -57.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNGU and NRGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNGU	NRGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.84%	-57.50%	-3.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-59.55%	-55.24%	-4.31%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.94%	-17.40%	-34.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.87%	-25.38%	+3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.51%	27.12%	-4.61%

Volatility

FNGU vs. NRGU - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) have volatilities of 24.03% and 23.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNGU	NRGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.03%	23.31%	+0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	44.97%	50.27%	-5.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.71%	88.18%	-10.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	80.80%	87.12%	-6.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	80.80%	87.12%	-6.32%