PortfoliosLab logo
NRGU vs. WTIU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and WTIU is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NRGU vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

NRGU:

131.49%

WTIU:

132.52%

Max Drawdown

NRGU:

-57.50%

WTIU:

-76.28%

Current Drawdown

NRGU:

-44.49%

WTIU:

-68.06%

Returns By Period


NRGU

YTD

N/A

1M

5.49%

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

WTIU

YTD

-18.65%

1M

8.46%

6M

-48.37%

1Y

-56.66%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


NRGU vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NRGU and WTIU have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NRGU vs. WTIU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NRGU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NRGU is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NRGU is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NRGU is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NRGU is 66
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of WTIU is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of WTIU is 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of WTIU is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of WTIU is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of WTIU is 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of WTIU is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NRGU vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NRGU vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

Neither NRGU nor WTIU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and WTIU.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NRGU vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...