NRGU vs. TQQQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

NRGU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds - NRGU tracks the Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index while TQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, NRGU returned 166.43% vs 56.87% for TQQQ. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 157.14% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 23.06% return.

NRGU

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: 51.26%
• 6M: 91.25%
• YTD: 157.14%
• 1Y: 166.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 50.40%

TQQQ

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -11.90%
• 6M: 20.14%
• YTD: 23.06%
• 1Y: 56.87%
• 3Y*: 43.81%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 39.46%
• ALL TIME*: 42.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	$4.57M	$4.13M	$3.95M
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	$4.37B	$4.57B	$5.33B

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	157.14%	-30.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	23.06%	17.60%

Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and TQQQ is -0.16, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.01

The correlation between NRGU and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NRGU	TQQQ
Energy	100.0%	0.6%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Financial Services	-	0.2%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

NRGU vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRGU

NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 75
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 63

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NRGU	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	0.83	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	1.38	+0.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.17	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	1.29	+2.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.59	3.60	+3.99

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NRGU	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.50%	-81.66%	+24.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.89%	-36.97%	-6.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.31%	-25.74%	+14.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.74%	-18.49%	-7.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.55%	13.24%	+6.31%

Volatility

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) has a higher volatility of 22.83% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 20.41%. This indicates that NRGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NRGU	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.83%	20.41%	+2.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	64.33%	47.79%	+16.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.39%	57.62%	+19.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	88.47%	68.04%	+20.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	88.47%	66.57%	+21.90%

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NRGU and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

NRGU vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NRGU MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.58%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NRGU and TQQQ in my portfolio?

NRGU and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NRGU or TQQQ?

NRGU has higher volatility (22.83%) compared to TQQQ (20.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGU dropped -57.50% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which ETF is better, NRGU or TQQQ?

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 166.43% vs 56.87% for TQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 20.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NRGU or TQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 166.43% return vs 56.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NRGU or TQQQ?

NRGU and TQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NRGU or TQQQ?

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

What is the main difference between NRGU and TQQQ?

NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and ProShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.