PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NRGU vs. JNUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NRGU vs. JNUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NRGU achieves a 157.14% return, which is significantly higher than JNUG's -45.63% return.


NRGU

1D
2.86%
1M
51.26%
6M
91.25%
YTD
157.14%
1Y
166.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
50.40%

JNUG

1D
-7.15%
1M
-15.90%
6M
-52.25%
YTD
-45.63%
1Y
55.90%
3Y*
52.37%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
-32.42%
ALL TIME*
-36.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$33.40M$38.00M$44.93M
$4.57M$4.13M$3.95M

NRGU vs. JNUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NRGU and JNUG is -0.10, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025

-0.10

NRGU vs. JNUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NRGU
JNUG

Energy

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Energy

NRGU
100.0%
JNUG

-

Basic Materials

NRGU

-

JNUG
100.0%

Communication Services

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Consumer Cyclical

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Consumer Defensive

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Financial Services

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Healthcare

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Industrials

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Real Estate

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Technology

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Utilities

NRGU

-

JNUG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NRGU vs. JNUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NRGU
NRGU Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NRGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NRGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
NRGU Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
NRGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
NRGU Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

JNUG
JNUG Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
JNUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
JNUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NRGU vs. JNUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) and Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NRGUJNUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.18

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

0.85

+2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.59

1.67

+5.92

NRGU vs. JNUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NRGU Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the JNUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NRGU and JNUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NRGU vs. JNUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NRGU drawdown since its inception was -57.50%, smaller than the maximum JNUG drawdown of -99.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NRGU and JNUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NRGUJNUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.50%

-99.95%

+42.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.89%

-70.58%

+26.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.31%

-99.70%

+88.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.74%

-93.93%

+68.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.55%

35.99%

-16.44%

Volatility

NRGU vs. JNUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN (NRGU) is 22.83%, while Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (JNUG) has a volatility of 29.49%. This indicates that NRGU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NRGUJNUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.83%

29.49%

-6.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

64.33%

90.25%

-25.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

77.39%

107.20%

-29.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

88.47%

82.38%

+6.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

88.47%

105.73%

-17.26%

NRGU vs. JNUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

NRGU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than JNUG's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

NRGU vs. JNUG - Dividend Comparison

NRGU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JNUG
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
2.62%1.04%2.01%1.62%0.00%0.52%0.10%0.46%0.06%0.51%
NRGU
MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NRGU and JNUG have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JNUG has higher volatility (29.49%) compared to NRGU (22.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NRGU dropped -57.50% vs JNUG's -99.95%.

On 1-year performance, NRGU leads with 166.43% vs 55.90% for JNUG. On fees, NRGU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, NRGU has been the lower-risk option at 22.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NRGU has performed better with a 166.43% return vs 55.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NRGU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for JNUG.

JNUG has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for NRGU.

NRGU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while JNUG is Gold. NRGU tracks Solactive MicroSectors U.S. Big Oil Index, while JNUG tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NRGU and 1.03% for JNUG.

NRGU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NRGU and JNUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer