FNDF vs. BAGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX).
FNDF is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell Fundamental Developed ex-U.S. Large Company Index. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013. BAGSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000.
Performance
FNDF vs. BAGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FNDF vs. BAGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 8.23% | 40.99% | 2.29% | 20.22% | -7.78% | 14.97% | 3.61% | 18.46% | -14.21% | 23.98% |
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | -0.31% | 7.11% | 1.63% | 6.12% | -13.52% | -1.74% | 8.42% | 9.17% | -0.55% | 3.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDF achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than BAGSX's -0.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDF has outperformed BAGSX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while BAGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.81% annualized return.
FNDF
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -7.26%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 40.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
BAGSX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -0.31%
- 6M
- 0.69%
- 1Y
- 4.01%
- 3Y*
- 3.80%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- 1.81%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FNDF vs. BAGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDF has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than BAGSX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FNDF vs. BAGSX — Risk / Return Rank
FNDF
BAGSX
FNDF vs. BAGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) and Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FNDF | BAGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.31 | 0.99 | +1.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.02 | 1.42 | +1.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.18 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 1.79 | +1.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.78 | 5.16 | +8.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FNDF | BAGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 0.99 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.04 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | 0.37 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.92 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDF and BAGSX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FNDF vs. BAGSX - Dividend Comparison
FNDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than BAGSX's 3.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF | 3.18% | 3.44% | 4.01% | 3.41% | 3.10% | 3.54% | 2.17% | 3.20% | 3.47% | 2.32% | 2.42% | 2.08% |
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.76% | 3.69% | 3.62% | 3.10% | 2.33% | 1.68% | 3.02% | 2.41% | 2.53% | 2.21% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
FNDF vs. BAGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDF drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than BAGSX's maximum drawdown of -18.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDF and BAGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDF | BAGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -18.97% | -21.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.08% | -2.64% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.56% | -18.84% | -6.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | -18.97% | -21.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.26% | -2.14% | -5.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -2.53% | -5.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 0.92% | +1.91% |
Volatility
FNDF vs. BAGSX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental International Large Company Index ETF (FNDF) has a higher volatility of 8.06% compared to Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) at 1.64%. This indicates that FNDF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BAGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FNDF | BAGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.06% | 1.64% | +6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 2.56% | +8.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 4.27% | +13.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 5.91% | +10.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 4.89% | +12.75% |