BAGSX vs. EAGG
BAGSX (Baird Aggregate Bond Fund) and EAGG (iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, BAGSX returned -0.36%/yr vs -0.49%/yr for EAGG. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BAGSX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EAGG.
Performance
BAGSX vs. EAGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a -0.44% return, which is significantly higher than EAGG's -0.56% return.
BAGSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -0.84%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- YTD
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 3.99%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 1.48%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.90%
EAGG
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 1Y
- 1.82%
- 3Y*
- 3.85%
- 5Y*
- -0.49%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $13.53M | $14.23M | $19.73M |
BAGSX vs. EAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | -0.44% | 7.11% | 1.63% | 6.12% | -13.52% | -1.74% | 8.42% | 9.17% | 2.14% |
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | -0.56% | 7.18% | 1.12% | 5.58% | -13.63% | -1.30% | 7.40% | 8.68% | 2.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAGSX and EAGG is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2018 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BAGSX and EAGG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAGSX vs. EAGG — Risk / Return Rank
BAGSX
EAGG
BAGSX vs. EAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAGSX | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.13 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.99 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 2.52 | -0.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAGSX vs. EAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, roughly equal to the maximum EAGG drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and EAGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAGSX | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -18.74% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -2.75% | -0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.11% | -5.06% | -0.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.84% | -17.98% | -0.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -3.59% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -5.98% | +3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.16% | 1.08% | +0.08% |
Volatility
BAGSX vs. EAGG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) is 0.93%, while iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF (EAGG) has a volatility of 0.98%. This indicates that BAGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAGG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAGSX | EAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | 0.98% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 2.87% | +0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.70% | 3.70% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 6.03% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 5.47% | -0.57% |
BAGSX vs. EAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAGSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EAGG's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAGSX vs. EAGG - Dividend Comparison
BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.86%, less than EAGG's 4.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.86% | 3.69% | 3.62% | 3.10% | 2.33% | 1.68% | 3.02% | 2.41% | 2.53% | 2.21% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
EAGG iShares ESG Aware US Aggregate Bond ETF | 3.72% | 3.92% | 3.93% | 3.24% | 2.07% | 1.09% | 1.82% | 3.17% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, BAGSX and EAGG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
EAGG has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to BAGSX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGSX dropped -18.97% vs EAGG's -18.74%.
BAGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAGSX and EAGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer