BAGSX vs. SCHZ
BAGSX (Baird Aggregate Bond Fund) and SCHZ (Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both funds - BAGSX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Baird, while SCHZ is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, BAGSX returned 1.66%/yr vs 1.49%/yr for SCHZ. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BAGSX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHZ.
Performance
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than SCHZ's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, BAGSX has outperformed SCHZ with an annualized return of 1.66%, while SCHZ has yielded a comparatively lower 1.49% annualized return.
BAGSX
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 4.05%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.66%
SCHZ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.03%
- 10Y*
- 1.49%
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 0.21% | 7.11% | 1.63% | 6.12% | -13.52% | -1.74% | 8.42% | 9.17% | -0.55% | 3.90% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.47% | 7.24% | 1.26% | 5.60% | -13.17% | -1.72% | 7.46% | 8.65% | -0.26% | 3.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between BAGSX and SCHZ is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between BAGSX and SCHZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BAGSX vs. SCHZ — Risk / Return Rank
BAGSX
SCHZ
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BAGSX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.60 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.27 | 4.59 | -0.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHZ drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and SCHZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BAGSX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.97% | -18.74% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -2.70% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.17% | -6.18% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.84% | -18.01% | -0.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.97% | -18.74% | -0.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.63% | -2.30% | +0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.52% | -3.68% | +1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 0.94% | +0.08% |
Volatility
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Volatility Comparison
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (SCHZ) have volatilities of 1.15% and 1.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BAGSX | SCHZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 1.15% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 2.78% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.74% | 3.76% | -0.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 6.09% | -0.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.90% | 5.42% | -0.52% |
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
BAGSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHZ's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
BAGSX vs. SCHZ - Dividend Comparison
BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than SCHZ's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAGSX Baird Aggregate Bond Fund | 3.81% | 3.69% | 3.62% | 3.10% | 2.33% | 1.68% | 3.02% | 2.41% | 2.53% | 2.21% | 1.96% | 2.14% |
SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.11% | 4.05% | 3.96% | 3.28% | 2.63% | 2.16% | 2.43% | 2.79% | 2.56% | 2.40% | 2.24% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, BAGSX and SCHZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHZ has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to BAGSX (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BAGSX dropped -18.97% vs SCHZ's -18.74%.
BAGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BAGSX and SCHZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer