PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BAGSX vs. BIMSX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


BAGSXBIMSX
YTD Return2.45%3.19%
1Y Return9.36%7.58%
3Y Return (Ann)-2.04%-0.47%
5Y Return (Ann)-0.09%0.61%
10Y Return (Ann)1.53%1.47%
Sharpe Ratio1.612.07
Sortino Ratio2.373.14
Omega Ratio1.291.40
Calmar Ratio0.580.70
Martin Ratio6.028.75
Ulcer Index1.57%0.87%
Daily Std Dev5.90%3.67%
Max Drawdown-19.80%-14.54%
Current Drawdown-8.56%-4.09%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between BAGSX and BIMSX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

BAGSX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, BAGSX achieves a 2.45% return, which is significantly lower than BIMSX's 3.19% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BAGSX having a 1.53% annualized return and BIMSX not far behind at 1.47%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
4.11%
3.57%
BAGSX
BIMSX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BAGSX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BAGSX and BIMSX have an expense ratio of 0.55%.


BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
Expense ratio chart for BAGSX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%
Expense ratio chart for BIMSX: current value at 0.55% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.55%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BAGSX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BAGSX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 2.37, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.37
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.29
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BAGSX, currently valued at 6.02, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.006.02
BIMSX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 3.14, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.14
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 0.70, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.000.70
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BIMSX, currently valued at 8.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.008.75

BAGSX vs. BIMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BAGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the BIMSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BAGSX and BIMSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.61
2.07
BAGSX
BIMSX

Dividends

BAGSX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison

BAGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than BIMSX's 3.36% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
BAGSX
Baird Aggregate Bond Fund
3.49%3.10%2.33%1.58%1.94%2.41%2.53%2.21%2.14%2.17%2.53%2.99%
BIMSX
Baird Intermediate Bond Fund
3.36%2.80%1.83%1.24%1.83%2.17%2.13%1.95%1.90%1.93%2.06%2.16%

Drawdowns

BAGSX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BAGSX drawdown since its inception was -19.80%, which is greater than BIMSX's maximum drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BAGSX and BIMSX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.56%
-4.09%
BAGSX
BIMSX

Volatility

BAGSX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison

Baird Aggregate Bond Fund (BAGSX) has a higher volatility of 1.63% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 0.95%. This indicates that BAGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.60%0.80%1.00%1.20%1.40%1.60%1.80%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.63%
0.95%
BAGSX
BIMSX