FNDC vs. PXF

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FNDC (Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF) and PXF (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDC is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US, while PXF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDC returned 8.59%/yr vs 11.69%/yr for PXF. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDC charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PXF.

Performance

FNDC vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDC achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 16.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDC has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 8.59%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.69% annualized return.

FNDC

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: -4.11%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 11.32%
• 1Y: 23.62%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: 8.59%

PXF

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: 16.56%
• 6M: 20.08%
• 1Y: 38.53%
• 3Y*: 23.53%
• 5Y*: 12.81%
• 10Y*: 11.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDC vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	9.07%	35.65%	1.38%	14.92%	-14.71%	10.26%	6.58%	20.58%	-19.10%	29.22%
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF	16.56%	42.51%	4.54%	18.46%	-9.09%	15.93%	2.58%	17.50%	-14.84%	24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDC and PXF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.93

The correlation between FNDC and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDC vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDC	PXF
Industrials	25.8%	15.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.8%	10.2%
Financial Services	11.5%	19.7%
Basic Materials	11.0%	10.1%
Technology	8.7%	11.4%
Real Estate	6.9%	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	6.1%
Healthcare	4.9%	7.2%
Communication Services	4.8%	4.3%
Energy	4.6%	10.6%
Utilities	2.8%	3.6%

Return for Risk

FNDC vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDC

FNDC Risk / Return Rank: 51
FNDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FNDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
FNDC Omega Ratio Rank: 53
FNDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
FNDC Martin Ratio Rank: 51

PXF

PXF Risk / Return Rank: 80
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 82
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDC vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDC	PXF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.46	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	3.19	-0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.45	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.12	3.55	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.87	13.49	-5.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDC vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDC Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDC and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDC	PXF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.63	2.46	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	0.78	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	0.65	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.23	+0.25

Drawdowns

FNDC vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDC drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDC and PXF.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDC	PXF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.22%	-64.74%	+21.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-10.91%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.98%	-14.06%	+1.08%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.13%	-26.82%	-5.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.22%	-41.59%	-1.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.11%	-3.88%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	-15.26%	+6.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.01%	2.86%	+0.15%

Volatility

FNDC vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF (FNDC) is 4.98%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 6.06%. This indicates that FNDC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDC	PXF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	6.06%	-1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	13.53%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.55%	15.80%	-1.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	16.54%	-0.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.83%	18.07%	-1.24%

FNDC vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDC has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNDC vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

FNDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, more than PXF's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDC Schwab Fundamental International Small Co. Index ETF	3.54%	3.86%	3.59%	2.86%	1.98%	2.58%	1.77%	2.71%	2.68%	1.94%	1.95%	1.30%
PXF Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF	3.18%	3.64%	3.48%	3.55%	3.58%	3.74%	2.11%	3.50%	3.38%	2.78%	3.21%	3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDC and PXF in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, FNDC and PXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDC or PXF?

PXF has higher volatility (6.06%) compared to FNDC (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDC dropped -43.22% vs PXF's -64.74%.

Which ETF is better, FNDC or PXF?

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 11.69% vs 8.59% for FNDC. On fees, FNDC is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FNDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDC or PXF?

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 11.69% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDC or PXF?

FNDC is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PXF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDC or PXF?

FNDC has the higher dividend yield at 3.54%, compared with 3.18% for PXF.

What is the main difference between FNDC and PXF?

FNDC is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. FNDC tracks Russell RAFI Small Company Developed x US, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FNDC and 0.45% for PXF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.