FNDA vs. VOO
FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company US, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDA returned 11.35%/yr vs 15.50%/yr for VOO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
FNDA vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 18.31% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 11.35%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.50% annualized return.
FNDA
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 6.65%
- YTD
- 18.31%
- 6M
- 15.70%
- 1Y
- 35.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.35%
VOO
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 9.44%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.50%
FNDA vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 18.31% | 7.44% | 9.00% | 20.29% | -14.83% | 31.12% | 8.44% | 24.34% | -12.12% | 12.68% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 9.08% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between FNDA and VOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 15, 2013 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FNDA and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FNDA vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FNDA
VOO
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
FNDA
VOO
Technology
FNDA
VOO
Financial Services
FNDA
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
FNDA
VOO
Real Estate
FNDA
VOO
Healthcare
FNDA
VOO
Energy
FNDA
VOO
Basic Materials
FNDA
VOO
Communication Services
FNDA
VOO
Consumer Defensive
FNDA
VOO
Utilities
FNDA
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FNDA vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
FNDA
VOO
FNDA vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FNDA | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 2.75 | +0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 12.42 | -0.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FNDA vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FNDA | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.64% | -33.99% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -8.90% | -0.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.92% | -18.69% | -7.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.92% | -24.52% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.64% | -33.99% | -10.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.34% | +2.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -3.68% | -3.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 1.97% | +0.92% |
Volatility
FNDA vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.34%. This indicates that FNDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FNDA | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 4.34% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 9.58% | +2.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 12.27% | +5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.93% | 16.88% | +4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 18.03% | +4.36% |
FNDA vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FNDA vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, which matches VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.06% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FNDA and VOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FNDA has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to VOO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.50% vs 11.35% for FNDA. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.50% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDA.
FNDA and VOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 1.06%.
FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FNDA and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer