FNDA vs. QQQS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and QQQS (Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - FNDA tracks the Russell RAFI Small Company US while QQQS tracks the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FNDA returned 15.77%/yr vs 15.89%/yr for QQQS. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FNDA charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for QQQS.

Performance

FNDA vs. QQQS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 14.87% return, which is significantly lower than QQQS's 27.27% return.

FNDA

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 14.87%
• 6M: 14.27%
• 1Y: 30.96%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: 10.87%

QQQS

• 1D: -1.70%
• 1M: 5.91%
• YTD: 27.27%
• 6M: 27.40%
• 1Y: 79.99%
• 3Y*: 15.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDA vs. QQQS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	14.87%	7.44%	9.00%	20.29%	5.56%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	27.27%	23.03%	10.20%	-1.94%	6.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and QQQS is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022	0.83

The correlation between FNDA and QQQS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDA vs. QQQS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDA	QQQS
Industrials	18.9%	4.8%
Technology	14.9%	42.1%
Financial Services	14.6%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	5.2%
Real Estate	9.9%	-
Healthcare	6.8%	41.0%
Energy	6.2%	2.2%
Basic Materials	5.2%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	1.4%
Communication Services	4.1%	2.4%
Utilities	2.8%	-

Return for Risk

FNDA vs. QQQS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 56
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

QQQS

QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 85
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. QQQS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDA	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	3.00	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.78	-1.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.44	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.32	5.90	-2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.73	19.70	-8.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDA vs. QQQS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is lower than the QQQS Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and QQQS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDA	QQQS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	3.00	-1.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.63	-0.14

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. QQQS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, which is greater than QQQS's maximum drawdown of -38.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and QQQS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDA	QQQS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.64%	-38.06%	-6.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-13.63%	+4.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.92%	-34.32%	+8.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.01%	-2.55%	+1.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-13.26%	+6.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.89%	4.07%	-1.18%

Volatility

FNDA vs. QQQS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) is 4.38%, while Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that FNDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDA	QQQS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	7.39%	-3.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.79%	18.49%	-6.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	26.90%	-9.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.89%	28.34%	-7.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.37%	28.34%	-5.97%

FNDA vs. QQQS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNDA has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQS's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDA vs. QQQS - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than QQQS's 2.73% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.09%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF	2.73%	3.48%	0.80%	0.68%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDA and QQQS in my portfolio?

FNDA and QQQS have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNDA or QQQS?

QQQS has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to FNDA (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs QQQS's -38.06%.

Which ETF is better, FNDA or QQQS?

On 3-year performance, QQQS leads with 15.89% vs 15.77% for FNDA. On fees, QQQS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDA or QQQS?

Over the 3-year period, QQQS has performed better with a 15.89% return vs 15.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDA or QQQS?

QQQS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDA or QQQS?

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.

What is the main difference between FNDA and QQQS?

FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FNDA and 0.20% for QQQS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.