PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQS vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 22.53% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.02% return.


QQQS

1D
-1.74%
1M
-5.51%
6M
18.80%
YTD
22.53%
1Y
58.92%
3Y*
14.73%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.01%

VUG

1D
1.10%
1M
-0.35%
6M
6.39%
YTD
5.02%
1Y
15.36%
3Y*
21.19%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
17.38%
ALL TIME*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$275.26K$351.10K$376.36K
$556.11M$661.72M$650.91M

QQQS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
22.53%23.03%10.20%-1.94%11.47%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.02%19.40%32.69%46.83%1.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and VUG is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2022

0.65

The correlation between QQQS and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQS vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQS
VUG

Healthcare

57.1%
4.7%

Technology

26.0%
56.2%

Industrials

6.0%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
11.5%

Communication Services

2.9%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
1.4%

Basic Materials

0.5%
0.5%

Energy

0.4%
0.3%

Financial Services

0.1%
3.8%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Utilities

-

0.7%

Healthcare

QQQS
57.1%
VUG
4.7%

Technology

QQQS
26.0%
VUG
56.2%

Industrials

QQQS
6.0%
VUG
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQS
5.7%
VUG
11.5%

Communication Services

QQQS
2.9%
VUG
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

QQQS
1.4%
VUG
1.4%

Basic Materials

QQQS
0.5%
VUG
0.5%

Energy

QQQS
0.4%
VUG
0.3%

Financial Services

QQQS
0.1%
VUG
3.8%

Real Estate

QQQS

-

VUG
1.0%

Utilities

QQQS

-

VUG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQSVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.13

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

0.78

+3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.89

2.47

+10.42

QQQS vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQSVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-50.68%

+12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-16.53%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.32%

-22.85%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.36%

-5.53%

-0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-7.08%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.33%

5.20%

-0.87%

Volatility

QQQS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 5.58%. This indicates that QQQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQSVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

5.58%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.29%

14.24%

+6.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.33%

17.74%

+9.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.41%

22.49%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.41%

21.55%

+6.86%

QQQS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than VUG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
2.69%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.40%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQS and VUG have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQS has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to VUG (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQS dropped -38.06% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 3-year performance, VUG leads with 21.19% vs 14.73% for QQQS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VUG has performed better with a 21.19% return vs 14.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQQS.

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.40% for VUG.

QQQS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VUG is Large Cap Growth Equities. QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQQS and 0.03% for VUG.

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQS and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer