PortfoliosLab logo
QQQS vs. CQQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and CQQQ is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

QQQS vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-6.81%
22.98%
QQQS
CQQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

QQQS:

-0.19

CQQQ:

0.51

Sortino Ratio

QQQS:

-0.06

CQQQ:

1.06

Omega Ratio

QQQS:

0.99

CQQQ:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

QQQS:

-0.16

CQQQ:

0.30

Martin Ratio

QQQS:

-0.53

CQQQ:

1.46

Ulcer Index

QQQS:

11.10%

CQQQ:

14.71%

Daily Std Dev

QQQS:

31.12%

CQQQ:

42.01%

Max Drawdown

QQQS:

-38.06%

CQQQ:

-73.99%

Current Drawdown

QQQS:

-27.19%

CQQQ:

-61.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a -19.07% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's 6.04% return.


QQQS

YTD

-19.07%

1M

-0.13%

6M

-13.17%

1Y

-6.05%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CQQQ

YTD

6.04%

1M

-5.97%

6M

1.39%

1Y

23.85%

5Y*

-3.09%

10Y*

-0.07%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQS vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for CQQQ: current value is 0.70%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CQQQ: 0.70%
Expense ratio chart for QQQS: current value is 0.20%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
QQQS: 0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QQQS vs. CQQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQS is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQS is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQS is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQS is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQS is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQS is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

CQQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CQQQ is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CQQQ is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

QQQS vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for QQQS, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
QQQS: -0.19
CQQQ: 0.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for QQQS, currently valued at -0.06, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
QQQS: -0.06
CQQQ: 1.06
The chart of Omega ratio for QQQS, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
QQQS: 0.99
CQQQ: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for QQQS, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
QQQS: -0.16
CQQQ: 0.54
The chart of Martin ratio for QQQS, currently valued at -0.53, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
QQQS: -0.53
CQQQ: 1.46

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the CQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and CQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.19
0.51
QQQS
CQQQ

Dividends

QQQS vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, more than CQQQ's 0.26% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
0.96%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CQQQ
Invesco China Technology ETF
0.26%0.28%0.55%0.08%0.00%0.47%0.01%0.43%1.41%1.69%1.77%1.00%

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and CQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-27.19%
-17.64%
QQQS
CQQQ

Volatility

QQQS vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) have volatilities of 16.88% and 16.59%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
16.88%
16.59%
QQQS
CQQQ