QQQS vs. CQQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ).
QQQS and CQQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQS is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2022. CQQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the AlphaShares China Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2009. Both QQQS and CQQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: QQQS or CQQQ.
Performance
QQQS vs. CQQQ - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly lower than CQQQ's 9.10% return.
QQQS
8.60%
5.35%
10.51%
29.21%
N/A
N/A
CQQQ
9.10%
-3.97%
11.29%
6.21%
-4.13%
1.21%
Key characteristics
| QQQS | CQQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.06 | 0.16 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.58 | 0.55 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.18 | 1.06 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.95 | 0.08 |
| Martin Ratio | 4.05 | 0.49 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.21% | 12.77% |
| Daily Std Dev | 27.65% | 38.46% |
| Max Drawdown | -38.06% | -73.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.34% | -63.50% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQS vs. CQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CQQQ's 0.70% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between QQQS and CQQQ is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
QQQS vs. CQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
QQQS vs. CQQQ - Dividend Comparison
QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, more than CQQQ's 0.50% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQS Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF | 0.77% | 0.68% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CQQQ Invesco China Technology ETF | 0.50% | 0.55% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.01% | 0.43% | 1.42% | 1.69% | 1.77% | 1.00% | 0.79% |
Drawdowns
QQQS vs. CQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, smaller than the maximum CQQQ drawdown of -73.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and CQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
QQQS vs. CQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) is 8.02%, while Invesco China Technology ETF (CQQQ) has a volatility of 12.37%. This indicates that QQQS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.