PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQS vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQS achieves a 29.47% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 11.69% return.


QQQS

1D
0.41%
1M
7.55%
YTD
29.47%
6M
33.29%
1Y
88.16%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
0.14%
1M
5.39%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.11%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
22.73%
5Y*
14.26%
10Y*
15.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
29.47%23.03%10.20%-1.94%6.56%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
11.69%17.82%24.98%26.32%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQS and VOO is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022

0.73

The correlation between QQQS and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQS vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQS
VOO

Technology

42.1%
35.7%

Healthcare

41.0%
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
10.2%

Industrials

4.8%
8.3%

Communication Services

2.4%
11.3%

Energy

2.2%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.4%
4.9%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.8%

Financial Services

0.0%
11.6%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Technology

QQQS
42.1%
VOO
35.7%

Healthcare

QQQS
41.0%
VOO
8.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQS
5.2%
VOO
10.2%

Industrials

QQQS
4.8%
VOO
8.3%

Communication Services

QQQS
2.4%
VOO
11.3%

Energy

QQQS
2.2%
VOO
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

QQQS
1.4%
VOO
4.9%

Basic Materials

QQQS
1.0%
VOO
1.8%

Financial Services

QQQS
0.0%
VOO
11.6%

Real Estate

QQQS

-

VOO
1.9%

Utilities

QQQS

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQS
QQQS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
QQQS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQS Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQSVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.30

2.53

+0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.07

3.43

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.46

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.59

3.42

+3.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

22.06

15.95

+6.11

QQQS vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQS Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQS and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQSVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

2.53

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.89

-0.24

Drawdowns

QQQS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQS drawdown since its inception was -38.06%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQS and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQSVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-33.99%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.63%

-8.90%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.32%

-18.69%

-15.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.86%

0.00%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.28%

-3.69%

-9.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.07%

1.91%

+2.16%

Volatility

QQQS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF (QQQS) has a higher volatility of 7.11% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that QQQS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQSVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

2.74%

+4.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.58%

8.88%

+9.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.84%

11.78%

+15.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.34%

16.81%

+11.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.34%

18.01%

+10.33%

QQQS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QQQS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQS
Invesco NASDAQ Future Gen 200 ETF
2.69%3.48%0.80%0.68%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.02%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQS and VOO have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQS has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQS dropped -38.06% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 3-year performance, VOO leads with 22.73% vs 16.56% for QQQS. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VOO has performed better with a 22.73% return vs 16.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QQQS.

QQQS has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.02% for VOO.

QQQS is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. QQQS tracks Nasdaq Innovators Completion Cap Total Return Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QQQS and 0.03% for VOO.

QQQS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQS and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer