FNDA vs. IJS

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

FNDA (Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF) and IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FNDA is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI Small Company US, while IJS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FNDA returned 10.81%/yr vs 10.04%/yr for IJS. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.

Performance

FNDA vs. IJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNDA achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly lower than IJS's 15.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FNDA has outperformed IJS with an annualized return of 10.81%, while IJS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.04% annualized return.

FNDA

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: -0.11%
• YTD: 14.40%
• 6M: 14.29%
• 1Y: 29.17%
• 3Y*: 14.87%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

IJS

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 15.51%
• 6M: 15.93%
• 1Y: 36.44%
• 3Y*: 13.49%
• 5Y*: 5.34%
• 10Y*: 10.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNDA vs. IJS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	14.40%	7.44%	9.00%	20.29%	-14.83%	31.12%	8.44%	24.34%	-12.12%	12.68%
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF	15.51%	6.54%	7.33%	14.68%	-11.34%	30.53%	2.63%	24.11%	-12.86%	11.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FNDA and IJS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2013	0.97

The correlation between FNDA and IJS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

FNDA vs. IJS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FNDA	IJS
Industrials	18.9%	11.6%
Technology	14.9%	11.3%
Financial Services	14.6%	19.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	15.9%
Real Estate	9.9%	8.7%
Healthcare	6.8%	7.6%
Energy	6.2%	7.6%
Basic Materials	5.2%	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.2%	3.8%
Communication Services	4.1%	4.4%
Utilities	2.8%	2.2%

Return for Risk

FNDA vs. IJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNDA

FNDA Risk / Return Rank: 59
FNDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FNDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
FNDA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FNDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FNDA Martin Ratio Rank: 62

IJS

IJS Risk / Return Rank: 71
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 63
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNDA vs. IJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FNDA	IJS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	2.00	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.85	-0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.34	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	3.94	-0.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.09	12.88	-2.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FNDA vs. IJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the IJS Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNDA and IJS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FNDA	IJS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	2.00	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.24	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.43	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.49	0.40	+0.08

Drawdowns

FNDA vs. IJS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNDA drawdown since its inception was -44.64%, smaller than the maximum IJS drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNDA and IJS.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNDA	IJS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.64%	-60.11%	+15.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-9.28%	-0.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.92%	-28.65%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.92%	-28.65%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.64%	-47.68%	+3.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.42%	-1.02%	-0.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.69%	-9.89%	+3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.90%	2.84%	+0.06%

Volatility

FNDA vs. IJS - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) have volatilities of 4.61% and 4.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNDA	IJS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.61%	4.79%	-0.18%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.98%	11.67%	+0.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.24%	18.38%	-1.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.91%	22.00%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.39%	23.61%	-1.22%

FNDA vs. IJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FNDA and IJS have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FNDA vs. IJS - Dividend Comparison

FNDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than IJS's 1.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF	1.09%	1.22%	1.53%	1.37%	1.38%	1.15%	1.31%	1.38%	1.64%	1.30%	1.18%	1.33%
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF	1.29%	1.62%	1.78%	1.42%	1.46%	1.52%	1.00%	1.66%	1.75%	1.41%	1.22%	1.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNDA and IJS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FNDA and IJS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FNDA or IJS?

IJS has higher volatility (4.79%) compared to FNDA (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNDA dropped -44.64% vs IJS's -60.11%.

Which ETF is better, FNDA or IJS?

On 10-year performance, FNDA leads with 10.81% vs 10.04% for IJS. Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. On volatility, FNDA has been the lower-risk option at 4.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FNDA or IJS?

Over the 10-year period, FNDA has performed better with a 10.81% return vs 10.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FNDA or IJS?

FNDA and IJS have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FNDA or IJS?

IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.29%, compared with 1.09% for FNDA.

What is the main difference between FNDA and IJS?

FNDA is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while IJS is Small Cap Value Equities. FNDA tracks Russell RAFI Small Company US, while IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600/Citigroup Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and iShares.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.