PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. ISCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. ISCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 20.25% return, which is significantly higher than ISCV's 17.01% return. Over the past 10 years, IJS has outperformed ISCV with an annualized return of 10.17%, while ISCV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.


IJS

1D
0.09%
1M
0.38%
6M
12.92%
YTD
20.25%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
10.17%
ALL TIME*
9.94%

ISCV

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.89%
6M
11.85%
YTD
17.01%
1Y
32.31%
3Y*
13.72%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
9.09%
ALL TIME*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$28.19M$29.28M$50.29M
$725.99K$721.48K$862.94K

IJS vs. ISCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
20.25%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
17.01%10.38%9.31%16.55%-10.58%29.15%0.86%19.51%-17.39%8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and ISCV is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2004

0.96

The correlation between IJS and ISCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJS vs. ISCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJS
ISCV

Financial Services

21.6%
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

15.0%
14.6%

Industrials

12.9%
12.7%

Technology

11.5%
8.4%

Real Estate

8.3%
11.3%

Energy

7.6%
5.0%

Healthcare

6.3%
11.4%

Basic Materials

5.9%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.7%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.5%

Utilities

2.1%
3.9%

Financial Services

IJS
21.6%
ISCV
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IJS
15.0%
ISCV
14.6%

Industrials

IJS
12.9%
ISCV
12.7%

Technology

IJS
11.5%
ISCV
8.4%

Real Estate

IJS
8.3%
ISCV
11.3%

Energy

IJS
7.6%
ISCV
5.0%

Healthcare

IJS
6.3%
ISCV
11.4%

Basic Materials

IJS
5.9%
ISCV
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

IJS
5.5%
ISCV
4.7%

Communication Services

IJS
3.5%
ISCV
2.5%

Utilities

IJS
2.1%
ISCV
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. ISCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCV
ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IJS vs. ISCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJSISCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

3.25

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

12.04

+1.63

IJS vs. ISCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the ISCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and ISCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJS vs. ISCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ISCV drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and ISCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSISCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-63.14%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.25%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-25.35%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-25.35%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

-51.56%

+3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-1.36%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.84%

-9.08%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

2.49%

+0.21%

Volatility

IJS vs. ISCV - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) have volatilities of 3.53% and 3.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSISCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

3.47%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.13%

10.28%

+0.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

15.74%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.71%

20.59%

+1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

23.20%

+0.34%

IJS vs. ISCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJS vs. ISCV - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than ISCV's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.32%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
1.83%2.04%2.01%2.21%2.12%1.95%2.01%2.36%2.48%1.74%2.49%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IJS and ISCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJS has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to ISCV (3.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs ISCV's -63.14%.

On 10-year performance, IJS leads with 10.17% vs 9.09% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJS has performed better with a 10.17% return vs 9.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.

ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.83%, compared with 1.32% for IJS.

IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.06% for ISCV.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and ISCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer