PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IJS vs. ISCV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IJS vs. ISCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IJS achieves a 17.64% return, which is significantly higher than ISCV's 12.15% return. Over the past 10 years, IJS has outperformed ISCV with an annualized return of 10.51%, while ISCV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.06% annualized return.


IJS

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.17%
YTD
17.64%
6M
15.52%
1Y
39.39%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*
10.51%

ISCV

1D
-0.04%
1M
2.51%
YTD
12.15%
6M
10.02%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
16.32%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IJS vs. ISCV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
17.64%6.54%7.33%14.68%-11.34%30.53%2.63%24.11%-12.86%11.35%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
12.15%10.38%9.31%16.55%-10.58%29.15%0.86%19.51%-17.39%8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between IJS and ISCV is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2004

0.96

The correlation between IJS and ISCV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

IJS vs. ISCV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IJS
ISCV

Financial Services

19.4%
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

15.4%
15.6%

Technology

13.4%
8.1%

Industrials

11.6%
12.7%

Real Estate

8.6%
11.5%

Healthcare

7.3%
8.7%

Energy

7.0%
5.8%

Basic Materials

6.9%
3.4%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.9%
4.7%

Utilities

2.1%
4.4%

Financial Services

IJS
19.4%
ISCV
22.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IJS
15.4%
ISCV
15.6%

Technology

IJS
13.4%
ISCV
8.1%

Industrials

IJS
11.6%
ISCV
12.7%

Real Estate

IJS
8.6%
ISCV
11.5%

Healthcare

IJS
7.3%
ISCV
8.7%

Energy

IJS
7.0%
ISCV
5.8%

Basic Materials

IJS
6.9%
ISCV
3.4%

Communication Services

IJS
4.4%
ISCV
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

IJS
3.9%
ISCV
4.7%

Utilities

IJS
2.1%
ISCV
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IJS vs. ISCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IJS
IJS Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
IJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJS Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCV
ISCV Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
ISCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCV Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IJS vs. ISCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) and iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IJSISCVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.32

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

3.23

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.04

11.27

+2.77

IJS vs. ISCV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IJS Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the ISCV Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IJS and ISCV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IJS vs. ISCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IJS drawdown since its inception was -60.11%, roughly equal to the maximum ISCV drawdown of -63.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IJS and ISCV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IJSISCVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.11%

-63.14%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.28%

-9.25%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.65%

-25.35%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.65%

-25.35%

-3.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.68%

-51.56%

+3.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-0.97%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-9.12%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

2.65%

+0.16%

Volatility

IJS vs. ISCV - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) has a higher volatility of 4.84% compared to iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF (ISCV) at 3.79%. This indicates that IJS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IJSISCVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

3.79%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.82%

10.58%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.38%

16.32%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.94%

20.78%

+1.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.62%

23.31%

+0.31%

IJS vs. ISCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IJS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCV's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IJS vs. ISCV - Dividend Comparison

IJS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than ISCV's 1.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IJS
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF
1.35%1.62%1.78%1.42%1.46%1.52%1.00%1.66%1.75%1.41%1.22%1.59%
ISCV
iShares Morningstar Small Cap Value ETF
1.91%2.04%2.01%2.21%2.12%1.95%2.01%2.36%2.48%1.74%2.49%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IJS and ISCV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IJS has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to ISCV (3.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IJS dropped -60.11% vs ISCV's -63.14%.

On 10-year performance, IJS leads with 10.51% vs 9.06% for ISCV. On fees, ISCV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IJS has performed better with a 10.51% return vs 9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IJS.

ISCV has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.35% for IJS.

IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while ISCV tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Value Extended Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IJS and 0.06% for ISCV.

IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IJS and ISCV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer