FMTL vs. CIBR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMTL is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while CIBR is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CIBR.

Performance

FMTL vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 17.39% return.

FMTL

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -11.71%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 6M: 13.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 17.39%
• 6M: 15.14%
• 1Y: 13.14%
• 3Y*: 24.59%
• 5Y*: 12.60%
• 10Y*: 18.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTL vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF	13.89%	21.85%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	17.39%	-5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FMTL and CIBR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

FMTL vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 17
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTL vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMTL	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.53	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.89	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.11	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.38	—

Drawdowns

FMTL vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMTL	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.44%	-33.89%	+11.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.99%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.89%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.61%	-11.23%	-3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.46%	-8.66%	+3.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	9.56%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FMTL	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.76%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	21.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.42%	25.15%	+15.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.42%	25.07%	+15.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.42%	23.59%	+16.83%

FMTL vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMTL vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than CIBR's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.47%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF	1.63%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMTL and CIBR in my portfolio?

FMTL and CIBR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FMTL or CIBR?

On fees, CIBR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMTL or CIBR?

CIBR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMTL or CIBR?

FMTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.63%, compared with 0.57% for CIBR.

What is the main difference between FMTL and CIBR?

FMTL is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while CIBR is Cybersecurity. FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.60% for CIBR.