FMTL vs. EART
FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) and EART (Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF) are both Rare Earth & Strategic Metals funds - FMTL tracks the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index while EART tracks the Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EART.
Performance
FMTL vs. EART - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 8.24% return, which is significantly higher than EART's -4.89% return.
FMTL
- 1D
- -2.90%
- 1M
- -15.01%
- 6M
- -5.93%
- YTD
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EART
- 1D
- -2.89%
- 1M
- -18.16%
- 6M
- -17.88%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 1Y
- 50.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMTL vs. EART - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 8.24% | 21.85% |
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | -4.89% | 22.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between FMTL and EART is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FMTL vs. EART — Risk / Return Rank
FMTL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EART
FMTL vs. EART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FMTL | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.82 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.74 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FMTL vs. EART - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, smaller than the maximum EART drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and EART.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FMTL | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -53.68% | +31.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.85% | -27.96% | +9.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.33% | -28.90% | +22.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.74% | — |
Volatility
FMTL vs. EART - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FMTL | EART | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.94% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.76% | 39.92% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.76% | 34.26% | +5.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.76% | 34.26% | +5.50% |
FMTL vs. EART - Expense Ratio Comparison
FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EART's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
FMTL vs. EART - Dividend Comparison
FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than EART's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EART Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF | 0.71% | 0.65% | 1.06% | 1.83% | 2.04% |
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF | 1.71% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FMTL and EART have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EART is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EART is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.
FMTL has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.71% for EART.
FMTL tracks Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.59% for EART.
Find the right allocation for FMTL and EART
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer