FMTL vs. CSNR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FMTL (First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF) and CSNR (Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FMTL is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the Indxx Global Critical Metals Index, while CSNR is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Cohen & Steers. FMTL is passively managed, while CSNR is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FMTL charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CSNR.

Performance

FMTL vs. CSNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMTL achieves a 13.89% return, which is significantly higher than CSNR's 9.84% return.

FMTL

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -11.71%
• YTD: 13.89%
• 6M: 13.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSNR

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -8.98%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 9.38%
• 1Y: 31.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMTL vs. CSNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF	13.89%	21.85%
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	9.84%	9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FMTL and CSNR is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

FMTL vs. CSNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMTL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CSNR

CSNR Risk / Return Rank: 60
CSNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CSNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
CSNR Omega Ratio Rank: 55
CSNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CSNR Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMTL vs. CSNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF (FMTL) and Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF (CSNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FMTL	CSNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.75	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.31	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.31	—

Drawdowns

FMTL vs. CSNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMTL drawdown since its inception was -22.44%, which is greater than CSNR's maximum drawdown of -15.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMTL and CSNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	FMTL	CSNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.44%	-15.33%	-7.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.61%	-11.16%	-3.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.46%	-2.03%	-3.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.77%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FMTL	CSNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.24%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	14.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.42%	17.96%	+22.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.42%	20.03%	+20.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.42%	20.03%	+20.39%

FMTL vs. CSNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMTL has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CSNR's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FMTL vs. CSNR - Dividend Comparison

FMTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than CSNR's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CSNR Cohen & Steers Natural Resources Active ETF	2.19%	2.39%
FMTL First Trust Indxx Critical Metals ETF	1.63%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FMTL and CSNR in my portfolio?

FMTL and CSNR have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FMTL or CSNR?

On fees, CSNR is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FMTL or CSNR?

CSNR is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FMTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FMTL or CSNR?

CSNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.19%, compared with 1.63% for FMTL.

What is the main difference between FMTL and CSNR?

FMTL is categorized as Rare Earth & Strategic Metals, while CSNR is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FMTL and 0.50% for CSNR.