PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMQQ vs. EEMS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMQQ vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMQQ achieves a -17.33% return, which is significantly lower than EEMS's 11.49% return.


FMQQ

1D
-1.59%
1M
0.22%
YTD
-17.33%
6M
-17.61%
1Y
-20.84%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
10Y*

EEMS

1D
-4.01%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
11.49%
6M
12.59%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
9.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FMQQ vs. EEMS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
-17.33%10.77%12.45%15.15%-54.03%-16.57%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
11.49%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%0.72%

Correlation

The correlation between FMQQ and EEMS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.73

The correlation between FMQQ and EEMS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMQQ vs. EEMS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FMQQ
FMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
FMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FMQQ vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMQQEEMSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.24

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.68

2.20

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.28

7.37

-8.64

FMQQ vs. EEMS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the EEMS Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMQQ and EEMS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMQQ vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMQQ drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, which is greater than EEMS's maximum drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMQQ and EEMS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMQQEEMSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.51%

-48.89%

-15.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.82%

-10.87%

-19.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.82%

-19.71%

-11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.31%

-5.08%

-50.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.41%

-10.48%

-38.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.34%

3.24%

+13.10%

Volatility

FMQQ vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) is 6.10%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that FMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMQQEEMSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

9.86%

-3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.16%

17.19%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.25%

19.11%

+0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.80%

16.50%

+8.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.80%

18.12%

+6.68%

FMQQ vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMS's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMQQ vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison

FMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than EEMS's 2.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.86%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
0.74%0.61%0.45%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMQQ and EEMS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMS has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to FMQQ (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMQQ dropped -64.51% vs EEMS's -48.89%.

On 3-year performance, EEMS leads with 15.45% vs 2.61% for FMQQ. On fees, EEMS is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EEMS has performed better with a 15.45% return vs 2.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EEMS is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FMQQ.

EEMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 0.74% for FMQQ.

FMQQ tracks FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net, while EEMS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: EMQQ and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FMQQ and 0.73% for EEMS.

EEMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMQQ and EEMS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer