PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMS vs. EYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMS vs. EYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 14.63% return, which is significantly lower than EYLD's 23.85% return.


EEMS

1D
-1.36%
1M
1.46%
YTD
14.63%
6M
16.52%
1Y
29.38%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
9.29%

EYLD

1D
-1.52%
1M
6.52%
YTD
23.85%
6M
25.44%
1Y
45.30%
3Y*
24.97%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMS vs. EYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
14.63%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%18.12%19.47%11.25%-18.98%34.80%
EYLD
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
23.85%29.39%4.72%18.77%-16.10%11.44%10.13%22.00%-13.74%34.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMS and EYLD is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2016

0.70

The correlation between EEMS and EYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EEMS vs. EYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMS
EYLD

Technology

22.7%
18.7%

Industrials

18.9%
17.4%

Financial Services

11.1%
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
6.3%

Healthcare

9.4%
2.1%

Basic Materials

9.3%
1.5%

Real Estate

5.9%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.2%

Communication Services

2.9%
2.7%

Utilities

2.7%
4.8%

Energy

2.4%
7.3%

Technology

EEMS
22.7%
EYLD
18.7%

Industrials

EEMS
18.9%
EYLD
17.4%

Financial Services

EEMS
11.1%
EYLD
20.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMS
9.6%
EYLD
6.3%

Healthcare

EEMS
9.4%
EYLD
2.1%

Basic Materials

EEMS
9.3%
EYLD
1.5%

Real Estate

EEMS
5.9%
EYLD
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

EEMS
5.2%
EYLD
3.2%

Communication Services

EEMS
2.9%
EYLD
2.7%

Utilities

EEMS
2.7%
EYLD
4.8%

Energy

EEMS
2.4%
EYLD
7.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMS vs. EYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

EYLD
EYLD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
EYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
EYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
EYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
EYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMS vs. EYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEMSEYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.71

2.55

-0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.31

3.34

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.46

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

4.33

-1.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.56

16.12

-6.56

EEMS vs. EYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the EYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMS and EYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEMSEYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

2.55

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.55

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.56

-0.24

Drawdowns

EEMS vs. EYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than EYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and EYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMSEYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-41.82%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-10.52%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-20.89%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-30.02%

+2.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.41%

-1.52%

-0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.50%

-10.29%

-0.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.82%

+0.26%

Volatility

EEMS vs. EYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) is 7.07%, while Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that EEMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMSEYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.07%

7.68%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.90%

14.94%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.30%

17.83%

-0.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.06%

18.28%

-2.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.99%

21.68%

-3.69%

EEMS vs. EYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMS has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than EYLD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMS vs. EYLD - Dividend Comparison

EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than EYLD's 4.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.69%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%
EYLD
Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF
4.89%5.40%5.16%5.54%6.97%7.27%3.02%4.21%7.87%2.77%0.75%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMS and EYLD have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EYLD has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to EEMS (7.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMS dropped -48.89% vs EYLD's -41.82%.

On 5-year performance, EYLD leads with 10.06% vs 6.92% for EEMS. On fees, EYLD is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, EEMS has been the lower-risk option at 7.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EYLD has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EYLD is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for EEMS.

EYLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 2.69% for EEMS.

EEMS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while EYLD is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for EEMS and 0.65% for EYLD.

EYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMS and EYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer