PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FMQQ vs. AIA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FMQQ vs. AIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FMQQ achieves a -9.49% return, which is significantly lower than AIA's 37.37% return.


FMQQ

1D
0.19%
1M
3.35%
6M
-5.83%
YTD
-9.49%
1Y
-10.97%
3Y*
2.86%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-13.42%

AIA

1D
1.38%
1M
-0.63%
6M
22.48%
YTD
37.37%
1Y
66.32%
3Y*
32.09%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
13.37%
ALL TIME*
7.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$72.11M$68.43M$74.19M
$165.12K$155.48K$92.62K

FMQQ vs. AIA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
-9.49%10.77%12.45%15.15%-54.03%-16.57%
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
37.37%47.79%20.26%4.32%-24.08%-2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FMQQ and AIA is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2021

0.62

The correlation between FMQQ and AIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

FMQQ vs. AIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FMQQ
AIA

Consumer Cyclical

32.7%
9.5%

Technology

6.6%
57.5%

Communication Services

6.4%
7.2%

Industrials

3.7%
2.0%

Financial Services

2.3%
20.6%

Utilities

1.5%

-

Real Estate

1.0%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.5%

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FMQQ
32.7%
AIA
9.5%

Technology

FMQQ
6.6%
AIA
57.5%

Communication Services

FMQQ
6.4%
AIA
7.2%

Industrials

FMQQ
3.7%
AIA
2.0%

Financial Services

FMQQ
2.3%
AIA
20.6%

Utilities

FMQQ
1.5%
AIA

-

Real Estate

FMQQ
1.0%
AIA
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

FMQQ
0.6%
AIA

-

Basic Materials

FMQQ

-

AIA
0.5%

Energy

FMQQ

-

AIA
0.6%

Healthcare

FMQQ

-

AIA
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FMQQ vs. AIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FMQQ
FMQQ Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FMQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FMQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

AIA
AIA Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIA Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIA Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FMQQ vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FMQQAIADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.35

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

3.81

-4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

12.04

-12.68

FMQQ vs. AIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FMQQ Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the AIA Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FMQQ and AIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FMQQ vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FMQQ drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, which is greater than AIA's maximum drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FMQQ and AIA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FMQQAIADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.51%

-60.89%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.82%

-16.83%

-13.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.82%

-21.64%

-9.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.07%

-11.13%

-39.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.49%

-16.61%

-32.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.93%

5.32%

+12.61%

Volatility

FMQQ vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF (FMQQ) is 4.57%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a volatility of 11.50%. This indicates that FMQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FMQQAIADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

11.50%

-6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.49%

28.26%

-11.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.46%

31.64%

-12.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.65%

26.69%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.65%

24.17%

+0.48%

FMQQ vs. AIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FMQQ has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than AIA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FMQQ vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison

FMQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than AIA's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
1.60%2.50%2.78%2.07%2.59%1.54%1.11%2.24%2.49%1.45%2.29%2.88%
FMQQ
FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce ETF
0.68%0.61%0.45%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FMQQ and AIA have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIA has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to FMQQ (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FMQQ dropped -64.51% vs AIA's -60.89%.

On 3-year performance, AIA leads with 32.09% vs 2.86% for FMQQ. On fees, AIA is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, FMQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AIA has performed better with a 32.09% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AIA is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for FMQQ.

AIA has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.68% for FMQQ.

FMQQ is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while AIA is Asia Pacific Equities. FMQQ tracks FMQQ The Next Frontier Internet & Ecommerce Index - Benchmark TR Net, while AIA tracks S&P Asia 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: EMQQ Global and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for FMQQ and 0.50% for AIA.

AIA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FMQQ and AIA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer