PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMS vs. DRESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMS vs. DRESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 3.97% return, which is significantly higher than DRESX's 2.62% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMS has underperformed DRESX with an annualized return of 7.78%, while DRESX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.92% annualized return.


EEMS

1D
0.35%
1M
-6.86%
6M
-2.58%
YTD
3.97%
1Y
12.59%
3Y*
10.45%
5Y*
4.98%
10Y*
7.78%
ALL TIME*
5.02%

DRESX

1D
1.70%
1M
-9.97%
6M
-5.73%
YTD
2.62%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
12.52%
5Y*
5.18%
10Y*
8.92%
ALL TIME*
7.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.19M$5.05M$6.10M

EEMS vs. DRESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
3.97%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%18.12%19.47%11.25%-18.98%34.80%
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
2.62%24.08%14.86%10.30%-21.17%15.93%33.56%33.70%-24.00%33.30%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMS and DRESX is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2011

0.68

The correlation between EEMS and DRESX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMS vs. DRESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

DRESX
DRESX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
DRESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRESX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
DRESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRESX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEMS vs. DRESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMSDRESXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.16

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

0.75

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

2.74

+0.25

EEMS vs. DRESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is comparable to the DRESX Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMS and DRESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMS vs. DRESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, which is greater than DRESX's maximum drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and DRESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMSDRESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-33.38%

-15.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.31%

-20.40%

+7.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-20.40%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-25.88%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-33.38%

-15.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.48%

-19.05%

+7.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.46%

-9.91%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

5.52%

-1.41%

Volatility

EEMS vs. DRESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) is 6.47%, while Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund (DRESX) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that EEMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMSDRESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.47%

7.19%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.25%

16.63%

+1.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.85%

18.51%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.69%

15.41%

+1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.17%

16.23%

+1.94%

EEMS vs. DRESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMS has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than DRESX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMS vs. DRESX - Dividend Comparison

EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than DRESX's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRESX
Driehaus Emerging Markets Small Cap Growth Fund
2.19%2.25%0.68%1.09%0.00%0.04%0.65%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
3.07%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMS and DRESX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRESX has higher volatility (7.19%) compared to EEMS (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMS dropped -48.89% vs DRESX's -33.38%.

DRESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMS and DRESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer