PortfoliosLab logo
EEMS vs. EDIV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between EEMS and EDIV is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

EEMS vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
71.03%
37.49%
EEMS
EDIV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

EEMS:

-0.02

EDIV:

0.87

Sortino Ratio

EEMS:

0.08

EDIV:

1.37

Omega Ratio

EEMS:

1.01

EDIV:

1.18

Calmar Ratio

EEMS:

-0.02

EDIV:

0.94

Martin Ratio

EEMS:

-0.06

EDIV:

2.50

Ulcer Index

EEMS:

6.83%

EDIV:

5.18%

Daily Std Dev

EEMS:

16.87%

EDIV:

14.04%

Max Drawdown

EEMS:

-48.89%

EDIV:

-53.35%

Current Drawdown

EEMS:

-6.98%

EDIV:

-1.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than EDIV's 6.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EEMS has underperformed EDIV with an annualized return of 4.11%, while EDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 4.63% annualized return.


EEMS

YTD

0.58%

1M

9.41%

6M

-2.28%

1Y

-0.35%

5Y*

13.40%

10Y*

4.11%

EDIV

YTD

6.78%

1M

9.72%

6M

5.21%

1Y

12.07%

5Y*

13.83%

10Y*

4.63%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EEMS vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMS has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

EEMS vs. EDIV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEMS is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEMS is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EDIV is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EDIV is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EDIV is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EDIV is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EDIV is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EDIV is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

EEMS vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current EEMS Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMS and EDIV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.02
0.87
EEMS
EDIV

Dividends

EEMS vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than EDIV's 4.01% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.58%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%2.67%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.01%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.93%5.33%4.84%

Drawdowns

EEMS vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and EDIV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-6.98%
-1.27%
EEMS
EDIV

Volatility

EEMS vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 3.87%. This indicates that EEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
5.62%
3.87%
EEMS
EDIV