PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEMS vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEMS vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEMS achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly higher than VWO's 10.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EEMS having a 9.32% annualized return and VWO not far behind at 8.97%.


EEMS

1D
-4.01%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
11.49%
6M
12.59%
1Y
23.79%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
6.33%
10Y*
9.32%

VWO

1D
-3.07%
1M
0.76%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.67%
1Y
27.03%
3Y*
17.42%
5Y*
5.09%
10Y*
8.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEMS vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
11.49%19.78%3.13%23.09%-19.12%18.12%19.47%11.25%-18.98%34.80%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
10.55%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between EEMS and VWO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2011

0.84

The correlation between EEMS and VWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

EEMS vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EEMS
VWO

Technology

26.4%
31.6%

Industrials

18.2%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
8.7%

Financial Services

9.9%
16.8%

Healthcare

8.7%
3.4%

Basic Materials

8.6%
7.0%

Real Estate

5.8%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.1%

Communication Services

2.9%
5.8%

Utilities

2.6%
2.4%

Energy

2.1%
3.6%

Technology

EEMS
26.4%
VWO
31.6%

Industrials

EEMS
18.2%
VWO
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EEMS
9.9%
VWO
8.7%

Financial Services

EEMS
9.9%
VWO
16.8%

Healthcare

EEMS
8.7%
VWO
3.4%

Basic Materials

EEMS
8.6%
VWO
7.0%

Real Estate

EEMS
5.8%
VWO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

EEMS
4.9%
VWO
3.1%

Communication Services

EEMS
2.9%
VWO
5.8%

Utilities

EEMS
2.6%
VWO
2.4%

Energy

EEMS
2.1%
VWO
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEMS vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEMS
EEMS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
EEMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEMS Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
EEMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEMS Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEMS vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEMSVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.30

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

2.43

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.37

8.56

-1.19

EEMS vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEMS and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEMS vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEMS drawdown since its inception was -48.89%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEMS and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEMSVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.89%

-67.68%

+18.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-11.17%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.71%

-17.37%

-2.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-32.60%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.89%

-36.39%

-12.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.08%

-3.07%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.48%

-15.79%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

3.17%

+0.07%

Volatility

EEMS vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) at 7.37%. This indicates that EEMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEMSVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

7.37%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.19%

14.62%

+2.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.11%

16.94%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

17.58%

-1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.12%

19.18%

-1.06%

EEMS vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEMS has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEMS vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

EEMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than VWO's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEMS
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF
2.86%3.09%2.60%2.69%0.89%3.56%2.14%2.64%3.06%2.47%2.51%2.33%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.33%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEMS and VWO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEMS has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to VWO (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEMS dropped -48.89% vs VWO's -67.68%.

On 10-year performance, EEMS leads with 9.32% vs 8.97% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VWO has been the lower-risk option at 7.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EEMS has performed better with a 9.32% return vs 8.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for EEMS.

EEMS has the higher dividend yield at 2.86%, compared with 2.33% for VWO.

EEMS is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. EEMS tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for EEMS and 0.08% for VWO.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEMS and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer